Governing good, bad and ugly workplaces? Explaining the paradox of state-steered voluntarism in New Labour’s skills strategy

Hannah Durrant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The post-compulsory education and training system in the UK has long been defined as an archetypical voluntarist model. Yet, with the election of a New Labour government in 1997, the relationship between the state as supply-side provider of skills and employers as the demanders of skills began to subtly change. An additional rhetoric emerged in skills policy that suggested a role for the state to shape higher skills demands. This instigated a move towards what is here defined by the oxymoron ‘state-steered voluntarism’; an approach to the governance of skills which aimed to deliver both a demand-led skills system and a system to lead demand. Drawing on policy documents and interviews with key policy-makers, this article offers an interpretive analysis of New Labour’s ideas about the nature of workplaces, and the role of the state and skills providers in response, that explains the existence of policy paradox. We find that New Labour articulated three distinct strategies for governing skills, depending on whether workplaces were perceived to have ‘good’, ‘bad’, or frankly ‘ugly’ skills aspirations. However, whilst this threefold skills strategy seemingly served the 25 purpose of containing multiple policy objectives and creating a graded role for state action, it was also prone to being used selectively by those with vested interests in UK skills policy (i.e. the representatives of businesses and employers and the representatives of employees and learners).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-401
JournalJournal of Education and Work
Volume29
Issue number4
Early online date22 Dec 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

voluntarism
New Labour
workplace
employer
compulsory education
demand
rhetoric
election
employee
governance
supply
interview
Paradox
Voluntarism
Work place

Keywords

  • Skills policy; governance; New Labour; skills demand and supply

Cite this

Governing good, bad and ugly workplaces? Explaining the paradox of state-steered voluntarism in New Labour’s skills strategy. / Durrant, Hannah.

In: Journal of Education and Work, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2016, p. 373-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4c8c284edd004a15af7e7ca2c0c51cdc,
title = "Governing good, bad and ugly workplaces? Explaining the paradox of state-steered voluntarism in New Labour’s skills strategy",
abstract = "The post-compulsory education and training system in the UK has long been defined as an archetypical voluntarist model. Yet, with the election of a New Labour government in 1997, the relationship between the state as supply-side provider of skills and employers as the demanders of skills began to subtly change. An additional rhetoric emerged in skills policy that suggested a role for the state to shape higher skills demands. This instigated a move towards what is here defined by the oxymoron ‘state-steered voluntarism’; an approach to the governance of skills which aimed to deliver both a demand-led skills system and a system to lead demand. Drawing on policy documents and interviews with key policy-makers, this article offers an interpretive analysis of New Labour’s ideas about the nature of workplaces, and the role of the state and skills providers in response, that explains the existence of policy paradox. We find that New Labour articulated three distinct strategies for governing skills, depending on whether workplaces were perceived to have ‘good’, ‘bad’, or frankly ‘ugly’ skills aspirations. However, whilst this threefold skills strategy seemingly served the 25 purpose of containing multiple policy objectives and creating a graded role for state action, it was also prone to being used selectively by those with vested interests in UK skills policy (i.e. the representatives of businesses and employers and the representatives of employees and learners).",
keywords = "Skills policy; governance; New Labour; skills demand and supply",
author = "Hannah Durrant",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/13639080.2014.987736",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "373--401",
journal = "Journal of Education and Work",
issn = "1363-9080",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governing good, bad and ugly workplaces? Explaining the paradox of state-steered voluntarism in New Labour’s skills strategy

AU - Durrant, Hannah

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The post-compulsory education and training system in the UK has long been defined as an archetypical voluntarist model. Yet, with the election of a New Labour government in 1997, the relationship between the state as supply-side provider of skills and employers as the demanders of skills began to subtly change. An additional rhetoric emerged in skills policy that suggested a role for the state to shape higher skills demands. This instigated a move towards what is here defined by the oxymoron ‘state-steered voluntarism’; an approach to the governance of skills which aimed to deliver both a demand-led skills system and a system to lead demand. Drawing on policy documents and interviews with key policy-makers, this article offers an interpretive analysis of New Labour’s ideas about the nature of workplaces, and the role of the state and skills providers in response, that explains the existence of policy paradox. We find that New Labour articulated three distinct strategies for governing skills, depending on whether workplaces were perceived to have ‘good’, ‘bad’, or frankly ‘ugly’ skills aspirations. However, whilst this threefold skills strategy seemingly served the 25 purpose of containing multiple policy objectives and creating a graded role for state action, it was also prone to being used selectively by those with vested interests in UK skills policy (i.e. the representatives of businesses and employers and the representatives of employees and learners).

AB - The post-compulsory education and training system in the UK has long been defined as an archetypical voluntarist model. Yet, with the election of a New Labour government in 1997, the relationship between the state as supply-side provider of skills and employers as the demanders of skills began to subtly change. An additional rhetoric emerged in skills policy that suggested a role for the state to shape higher skills demands. This instigated a move towards what is here defined by the oxymoron ‘state-steered voluntarism’; an approach to the governance of skills which aimed to deliver both a demand-led skills system and a system to lead demand. Drawing on policy documents and interviews with key policy-makers, this article offers an interpretive analysis of New Labour’s ideas about the nature of workplaces, and the role of the state and skills providers in response, that explains the existence of policy paradox. We find that New Labour articulated three distinct strategies for governing skills, depending on whether workplaces were perceived to have ‘good’, ‘bad’, or frankly ‘ugly’ skills aspirations. However, whilst this threefold skills strategy seemingly served the 25 purpose of containing multiple policy objectives and creating a graded role for state action, it was also prone to being used selectively by those with vested interests in UK skills policy (i.e. the representatives of businesses and employers and the representatives of employees and learners).

KW - Skills policy; governance; New Labour; skills demand and supply

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2014.987736

U2 - 10.1080/13639080.2014.987736

DO - 10.1080/13639080.2014.987736

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 373

EP - 401

JO - Journal of Education and Work

JF - Journal of Education and Work

SN - 1363-9080

IS - 4

ER -