Abstract
Since the mid-1990s, the aim of keeping climate change within 2 °C has become firmly entrenched in policy discourses. In the past few years, the likelihood of achieving it has been increasingly called into question. The debate around what to do with a target that seems less and less achievable is, however, only just beginning. As the UN commences a two-year review of the 2 °C target, this article moves beyond the somewhat binary debates about whether or not it should or will be met, in order to analyse more fully some of the alternative options that have been identified but not fully explored in the existing literature. For the first time, uncertainties, risks, and opportunities associated with four such options are identified and synthesized from the literature. The analysis finds that the significant risks and uncertainties associated with some options may encourage decision makers to recommit to the 2 °C target as the least unattractive course of action.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 751-769 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Climate Policy |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2013 |
Funding
Tim Rayner and Andy Jordan acknowledge support from the EU FP7 Responses project [grant number 244092].
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- adaptation policy
- climate policy
- global warming
- governance
- mitigation policy
- post-2012 negotiations
- risk governance
- two degrees
- UNFCCC
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Global and Planetary Change
- Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
- Atmospheric Science
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Going beyond two degrees? The risks and opportunities of alternative options'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS