Abstract
The centrepiece of this paper is Ghana’s Public Interest and Accountability Committee with empirical details of its politics of institutional choice and outcomes. The Committee is hailed as a model of ‘bottom-up’ reform and one of the principal reasons why Ghana is likely to circumvent a ‘resource curse’ situation associated with its petroleum resources. Far from this optimism, this article outlines key technocratic, political and other structural barriers that have undermined the Committee’s profile as a transformative instrument in the oil industry. It draws attention to the limitations of technocratic administrative fixes imposed by in-country and sectoral dynamics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 313-336 |
| Journal | Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 17 Jun 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ghana’s public interest and accountability committee: an elusive quest for “home-grown” transformation in the oil industry.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS