Abstract
Recent research on populism has shown how anti-populist politics have served to discredit alternatives to the status quo by constructing them as threats to democracy, creating false equivalences between vastly different political projects. Yet, while the people of populism are often represented as a threat, it would be a mistake to conclude that anti-populist discourse is equivalent to faith in the elite. We explore how elites and peoples are constructed in anti-populist discourses. Left-wing voters are constructed as active agents in their political choices, even though these choices are often blamed on their youth and/or minority status and radical naivety. Supporters of the far right are instead presented as having legitimate concerns around migration and nationhood, but manipulated by a crass ‘populist’ elite. In contrast, a ‘good’ people is constructed to justify the presence and leadership of the ‘good’ elite who rules for them (if not by and of them).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | British Journal of Politics and International Relations |
Early online date | 9 Jan 2025 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 9 Jan 2025 |
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the editors and reviewers for their constructive feedback. We would also like to thank the organisers and participants of the workshop on ‘anti-populism’ at the University of Bremen (March 2024) for their engagement with the paper.Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Keywords
- anti-populism
- depoliticisation
- discourse
- elite
- populism
- post-democracy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Political Science and International Relations
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law