Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Gene–environment correlations and causal effects of childhood maltreatment on physical and mental health: a genetically informed approach

Varun Warrier, Alex S.F. Kwong, Mannan Luo, Shareefa Dalvie, Jazz Croft, Hannah M. Sallis, Jessie Baldwin, Marcus R. Munafò, Caroline M. Nievergelt, Andrew J. Grant, Stephen Burgess, Tyler M. Moore, Ran Barzilay, Andrew McIntosh, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Charlotte A.M. Cecil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

177   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Background: Childhood maltreatment is associated with poor mental and physical health. However, the mechanisms of gene–environment correlations and the potential causal effects of childhood maltreatment on health are unknown. Using genetics, we aimed to delineate the sources of gene–environment correlation for childhood maltreatment and the causal relationship between childhood maltreatment and health. 

Methods: We did a genome-wide association study meta-analysis of childhood maltreatment using data from the UK Biobank (n=143 473), Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (n=26 290), Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (n=8346), Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (n=5400), and Generation R (n=1905). We included individuals who had phenotypic and genetic data available. We investigated single nucleotide polymorphism heritability and genetic correlations among different subtypes, operationalisations, and reports of childhood maltreatment. Family-based and population-based polygenic score analyses were done to elucidate gene–environment correlation mechanisms. We used genetic correlation and Mendelian randomisation analyses to identify shared genetics and test causal relationships between childhood maltreatment and mental and physical health conditions. 

Findings: Our meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (N=185 414) identified 14 independent loci associated with childhood maltreatment (13 novel). We identified high genetic overlap (genetic correlations 0·24–1·00) among different maltreatment operationalisations, subtypes, and reporting methods. Within-family analyses provided some support for active and reactive gene–environment correlation but did not show the absence of passive gene–environment correlation. Robust Mendelian randomisation suggested a potential causal role of childhood maltreatment in depression (unidirectional), as well as both schizophrenia and ADHD (bidirectional), but not in physical health conditions (coronary artery disease, type 2 diabetes) or inflammation (C-reactive protein concentration). 

Interpretation: Childhood maltreatment has a heritable component, with substantial genetic correlations among different operationalisations, subtypes, and retrospective and prospective reports of childhood maltreatment. Family-based analyses point to a role of active and reactive gene–environment correlation, with equivocal support for passive correlation. Mendelian randomisation supports a (primarily bidirectional) causal role of childhood maltreatment on mental health, but not on physical health conditions. Our study identifies research avenues to inform the prevention of childhood maltreatment and its long-term effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-386
Number of pages14
JournalThe Lancet Psychiatry
Volume8
Issue number5
Early online date31 May 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2021

Funding

Wellcome Trust, UK Medical Research Council, Horizon 2020, National Institute of Mental Health, and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gene–environment correlations and causal effects of childhood maltreatment on physical and mental health: a genetically informed approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this