Abstract
An accepted framework for ‘gendering’ the analysis of welfare regimes compares countries by degrees of ‘defamilialization’ or how far their family policies support or undermine women’s employment participation. This article develops an alternative framework that explicitly spotlights women’s labour market outcomes rather than policies. Using hierarchical clustering on principal components, it groups 24 industrialized countries by their simultaneous performance across multiple gendered employment outcomes spanning segregation and inequalities in employment participation, intensity, and pay, with further differences by class. The three core ‘worlds’ of welfare (social-democratic, corporatist, liberal) each displays a distinctive pattern of gendered employment outcomes. Only France diverges from expectations, as large gender pay gaps across the educational divide – likely due to fragmented wage-bargaining – place it with Anglophone countries. Nevertheless, the outcome-based clustering fails to support the idea of a homogeneous Mediterranean grouping or a singular Eastern European cluster. Furthermore, results underscore the complexity and idiosyncrasy of gender inequality: while certain groups of countries are ‘better’ overall performers, all have their flaws. Even the Nordics fall behind on some measures of segregation, despite narrow participatory and pay gaps for lower- and high-skilled groups. Accordingly, separately monitoring multiple measures of gender inequality, rather than relying on ‘headline’ indicators or gender equality indices, matters.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 151-168 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Journal of European Social Policy |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 19 Jan 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (grant no. ES/S016058/1).
Keywords
- Cluster analysis
- comparative family policy
- comparative social policy
- defamilialization
- gender inequality
- gendered trade-offs
- welfare state outcomes
- welfare state paradox
- welfare state typologies
- women’s employment
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Social Sciences
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law