Gender equality bargaining in France and the UK

an uphill struggle?

Susan Milner, Abigail Gregory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)
49 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Collective bargaining is widely advocated as one means of addressing continued gender pay disparities. However, since collective bargaining has been weakened as a mode of employment regulation, its efficacy relative to statutory regulation is a matter of debate. This article examines the relationship between collective bargaining and the law and the impact of bargaining content and structures on gender equality outcomes, by focusing on France and the United Kingdom, two EU countries which have markedly different collective bargaining traditions and structures, contrasting legal traditions and different gender regimes. The comparison highlights the respective contributions of supportive legislation, bargaining structures and bargaining equity as drivers of change, emphasizing the particular importance of supportive legislation in the two countries, as well as the particular vulnerability of UK gains (in the context of recessionary conditions, a voluntaristic approach and a weakened and localized bargaining framework) and the weakness of bargaining in relation in France, in the context of supportive legislation but inadequate legal enforcement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246 - 263
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Industrial Relations
Volume56
Issue number2
Early online date4 Feb 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2014

Fingerprint

Gender equality
France
Collective bargaining
Legislation
Efficacy
EU countries
Employment regulation
Equity
Legal enforcement
Vulnerability
Legal traditions

Cite this

Gender equality bargaining in France and the UK : an uphill struggle? / Milner, Susan; Gregory, Abigail.

In: Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 56, No. 2, 01.04.2014, p. 246 - 263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{efe1e77b70344ecea248f13be3801326,
title = "Gender equality bargaining in France and the UK: an uphill struggle?",
abstract = "Collective bargaining is widely advocated as one means of addressing continued gender pay disparities. However, since collective bargaining has been weakened as a mode of employment regulation, its efficacy relative to statutory regulation is a matter of debate. This article examines the relationship between collective bargaining and the law and the impact of bargaining content and structures on gender equality outcomes, by focusing on France and the United Kingdom, two EU countries which have markedly different collective bargaining traditions and structures, contrasting legal traditions and different gender regimes. The comparison highlights the respective contributions of supportive legislation, bargaining structures and bargaining equity as drivers of change, emphasizing the particular importance of supportive legislation in the two countries, as well as the particular vulnerability of UK gains (in the context of recessionary conditions, a voluntaristic approach and a weakened and localized bargaining framework) and the weakness of bargaining in relation in France, in the context of supportive legislation but inadequate legal enforcement.",
author = "Susan Milner and Abigail Gregory",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022185613509997",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "246 -- 263",
journal = "Journal of Industrial Relations",
issn = "0022-1856",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender equality bargaining in France and the UK

T2 - an uphill struggle?

AU - Milner, Susan

AU - Gregory, Abigail

PY - 2014/4/1

Y1 - 2014/4/1

N2 - Collective bargaining is widely advocated as one means of addressing continued gender pay disparities. However, since collective bargaining has been weakened as a mode of employment regulation, its efficacy relative to statutory regulation is a matter of debate. This article examines the relationship between collective bargaining and the law and the impact of bargaining content and structures on gender equality outcomes, by focusing on France and the United Kingdom, two EU countries which have markedly different collective bargaining traditions and structures, contrasting legal traditions and different gender regimes. The comparison highlights the respective contributions of supportive legislation, bargaining structures and bargaining equity as drivers of change, emphasizing the particular importance of supportive legislation in the two countries, as well as the particular vulnerability of UK gains (in the context of recessionary conditions, a voluntaristic approach and a weakened and localized bargaining framework) and the weakness of bargaining in relation in France, in the context of supportive legislation but inadequate legal enforcement.

AB - Collective bargaining is widely advocated as one means of addressing continued gender pay disparities. However, since collective bargaining has been weakened as a mode of employment regulation, its efficacy relative to statutory regulation is a matter of debate. This article examines the relationship between collective bargaining and the law and the impact of bargaining content and structures on gender equality outcomes, by focusing on France and the United Kingdom, two EU countries which have markedly different collective bargaining traditions and structures, contrasting legal traditions and different gender regimes. The comparison highlights the respective contributions of supportive legislation, bargaining structures and bargaining equity as drivers of change, emphasizing the particular importance of supportive legislation in the two countries, as well as the particular vulnerability of UK gains (in the context of recessionary conditions, a voluntaristic approach and a weakened and localized bargaining framework) and the weakness of bargaining in relation in France, in the context of supportive legislation but inadequate legal enforcement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898916148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022185613509997

U2 - 10.1177/0022185613509997

DO - 10.1177/0022185613509997

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 246

EP - 263

JO - Journal of Industrial Relations

JF - Journal of Industrial Relations

SN - 0022-1856

IS - 2

ER -