Gender and Learning: equity, equality and pedagogy

H Daniels, A Creese, V Hey, D Leonard, M Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article on gender and learning Harry Daniels and colleagues suggest that boys experience a contradiction between the cultural messages and practices associated with masculinity (competition and individuality) and the teaching practices typical of successful primary schooling (collaboration and codependency). They consider the impact of this contradiction on the question of boys' underachievement, and their account of the views of children as to whether boys and girls learn the same or differently makes salutary reading. ‘Which pedagogy,’ they ask, ‘suits who best?’
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)112-117
Number of pages6
JournalSupport for Learning
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2001

Fingerprint

equality
equity
gender
learning
individuality
teaching practice
masculinity
experience

Cite this

Daniels, H., Creese, A., Hey, V., Leonard, D., & Smith, M. (2001). Gender and Learning: equity, equality and pedagogy. Support for Learning, 16(3), 112-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.00201

Gender and Learning: equity, equality and pedagogy. / Daniels, H; Creese, A; Hey, V; Leonard, D; Smith, M.

In: Support for Learning, Vol. 16, No. 3, 08.2001, p. 112-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Daniels, H, Creese, A, Hey, V, Leonard, D & Smith, M 2001, 'Gender and Learning: equity, equality and pedagogy', Support for Learning, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 112-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.00201
Daniels H, Creese A, Hey V, Leonard D, Smith M. Gender and Learning: equity, equality and pedagogy. Support for Learning. 2001 Aug;16(3):112-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.00201
Daniels, H ; Creese, A ; Hey, V ; Leonard, D ; Smith, M. / Gender and Learning: equity, equality and pedagogy. In: Support for Learning. 2001 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 112-117.
@article{25111574ad7342efa8b4c42c92a923cf,
title = "Gender and Learning: equity, equality and pedagogy",
abstract = "In this article on gender and learning Harry Daniels and colleagues suggest that boys experience a contradiction between the cultural messages and practices associated with masculinity (competition and individuality) and the teaching practices typical of successful primary schooling (collaboration and codependency). They consider the impact of this contradiction on the question of boys' underachievement, and their account of the views of children as to whether boys and girls learn the same or differently makes salutary reading. ‘Which pedagogy,’ they ask, ‘suits who best?’",
author = "H Daniels and A Creese and V Hey and D Leonard and M Smith",
year = "2001",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9604.00201",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "112--117",
journal = "Support for Learning",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender and Learning: equity, equality and pedagogy

AU - Daniels, H

AU - Creese, A

AU - Hey, V

AU - Leonard, D

AU - Smith, M

PY - 2001/8

Y1 - 2001/8

N2 - In this article on gender and learning Harry Daniels and colleagues suggest that boys experience a contradiction between the cultural messages and practices associated with masculinity (competition and individuality) and the teaching practices typical of successful primary schooling (collaboration and codependency). They consider the impact of this contradiction on the question of boys' underachievement, and their account of the views of children as to whether boys and girls learn the same or differently makes salutary reading. ‘Which pedagogy,’ they ask, ‘suits who best?’

AB - In this article on gender and learning Harry Daniels and colleagues suggest that boys experience a contradiction between the cultural messages and practices associated with masculinity (competition and individuality) and the teaching practices typical of successful primary schooling (collaboration and codependency). They consider the impact of this contradiction on the question of boys' underachievement, and their account of the views of children as to whether boys and girls learn the same or differently makes salutary reading. ‘Which pedagogy,’ they ask, ‘suits who best?’

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.00201

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9604.00201

DO - 10.1111/1467-9604.00201

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 112

EP - 117

JO - Support for Learning

JF - Support for Learning

IS - 3

ER -