Abstract
We investigate whether gender differences in strategic behavior depend on the perceived gender bias of strategic interactions. We use two weakly dominance solvable games where a prize is at stake. The first one is the two-person beauty contest, where strategies are numbers and players must perform mathematical operations. The second is the novel
"gaze coach game", where strategies are photographs of the eye region and the two players must assign emotional states to these images. We find that males display significantly higher strategic sophistication than
females in the first game but not in the second one, which is perceived
to be female biased. However, females are underrepresented among top performers in both games.
"gaze coach game", where strategies are photographs of the eye region and the two players must assign emotional states to these images. We find that males display significantly higher strategic sophistication than
females in the first game but not in the second one, which is perceived
to be female biased. However, females are underrepresented among top performers in both games.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publisher | University of Bath |
Number of pages | 41 |
Publication status | Published - 31 Dec 2021 |
Publication series
Name | Bath Economics Research Papers |
---|---|
Publisher | University of Bath |
No. | 78/21 |