Funerals and families

locating death as a relational issue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Situated at the intersection of the Sociology of Death and Sociology of the Family, this paper argues that the organization and funding of funerals is an overlooked and available lens through which to examine cultural and political norms of familial obligation. Drawing on interviews with claimants to the Department for Work and Pensions’ Social Fund Funeral Payment, the paper shows how both responsibility for the organization and payment of a funeral is assumed within families, and how at times this can be overridden by the state. In highlighting the tension between reflexive choice and political norms of family espoused in this policy context, it supports Gilding's (2010) assertion that understanding family practice through reflexivity alone neglects the institutions and conventions within which ‘doing’ family takes place. In so doing, the paper further makes a case for families and relational negotiations and tensions to be more explicitly included within sociological understanding(s) of death more generally.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-259
Number of pages18
JournalBritish Journal of Sociology
Volume67
Issue number2
Early online date5 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

funeral
death
Political Norms
sociology of the family
organization
reflexivity
pension
neglect
obligation
sociology
funding
responsibility
interview

Keywords

  • Family
  • funerals
  • norms
  • obligation
  • reflexive relationism

Cite this

Funerals and families : locating death as a relational issue. / Woodthorpe, Kate; Rumble, Hannah.

In: British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 67, No. 2, 10.06.2016, p. 242-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0ddcaa2fb5944c6f88f6f7252a6471fb,
title = "Funerals and families: locating death as a relational issue",
abstract = "Situated at the intersection of the Sociology of Death and Sociology of the Family, this paper argues that the organization and funding of funerals is an overlooked and available lens through which to examine cultural and political norms of familial obligation. Drawing on interviews with claimants to the Department for Work and Pensions’ Social Fund Funeral Payment, the paper shows how both responsibility for the organization and payment of a funeral is assumed within families, and how at times this can be overridden by the state. In highlighting the tension between reflexive choice and political norms of family espoused in this policy context, it supports Gilding's (2010) assertion that understanding family practice through reflexivity alone neglects the institutions and conventions within which ‘doing’ family takes place. In so doing, the paper further makes a case for families and relational negotiations and tensions to be more explicitly included within sociological understanding(s) of death more generally.",
keywords = "Family, funerals, norms, obligation, reflexive relationism",
author = "Kate Woodthorpe and Hannah Rumble",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1111/1468-4446.12190",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "242--259",
journal = "British Journal of Sociology",
issn = "0007-1315",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Funerals and families

T2 - locating death as a relational issue

AU - Woodthorpe, Kate

AU - Rumble, Hannah

PY - 2016/6/10

Y1 - 2016/6/10

N2 - Situated at the intersection of the Sociology of Death and Sociology of the Family, this paper argues that the organization and funding of funerals is an overlooked and available lens through which to examine cultural and political norms of familial obligation. Drawing on interviews with claimants to the Department for Work and Pensions’ Social Fund Funeral Payment, the paper shows how both responsibility for the organization and payment of a funeral is assumed within families, and how at times this can be overridden by the state. In highlighting the tension between reflexive choice and political norms of family espoused in this policy context, it supports Gilding's (2010) assertion that understanding family practice through reflexivity alone neglects the institutions and conventions within which ‘doing’ family takes place. In so doing, the paper further makes a case for families and relational negotiations and tensions to be more explicitly included within sociological understanding(s) of death more generally.

AB - Situated at the intersection of the Sociology of Death and Sociology of the Family, this paper argues that the organization and funding of funerals is an overlooked and available lens through which to examine cultural and political norms of familial obligation. Drawing on interviews with claimants to the Department for Work and Pensions’ Social Fund Funeral Payment, the paper shows how both responsibility for the organization and payment of a funeral is assumed within families, and how at times this can be overridden by the state. In highlighting the tension between reflexive choice and political norms of family espoused in this policy context, it supports Gilding's (2010) assertion that understanding family practice through reflexivity alone neglects the institutions and conventions within which ‘doing’ family takes place. In so doing, the paper further makes a case for families and relational negotiations and tensions to be more explicitly included within sociological understanding(s) of death more generally.

KW - Family

KW - funerals

KW - norms

KW - obligation

KW - reflexive relationism

U2 - 10.1111/1468-4446.12190

DO - 10.1111/1468-4446.12190

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 242

EP - 259

JO - British Journal of Sociology

JF - British Journal of Sociology

SN - 0007-1315

IS - 2

ER -