Functional and mental health status of United Kingdom military amputees post-rehabilitation

Peter Ladlow, Rhodri Phillip, John Etherington, Russell Coppack, James Bilzon, M Polly McGuigan, Alexander N. Bennett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the functional and mental health status of severely injured traumatic amputees from the United Kingdom military at the completion of their rehabilitation pathway and to compare these data with the published normative data.DESIGN: Retrospective independent group comparison of descriptive rehabilitation data recorded postrehabilitation.SETTING: A military complex trauma rehabilitation center.PARTICIPANTS: Amputees (N=65; mean age, 29±6y) were evaluated at the completion of their rehabilitation pathway; of these, 54 were operationally (combat) injured (23 unilateral, 23 bilateral, 8 triple) and 11 nonoperationally injured (all unilateral).INTERVENTIONS: Continuous ∼4-week inpatient, physician-led, interdisciplinary rehabilitation followed by ∼4-weeks of patient-led, home-based rehabilitation.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The New Injury Severity Score at the point of injury was used as the baseline reference. The 6-minute walk test, Amputee Mobility Predictor with Prosthesis, Special Interest Group in Amputee Medicine, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre mobility and activity of daily living scores as well as depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder Scale-7), mental health support, and pain scores were recorded at discharge and compared with the published normative data.RESULTS: The mean New Injury Severity Score was 40±15. After 34±14 months of rehabilitation, amputees achieved a mean 6-minute walk distance of 489±117m compared with age-matched normative distances of 459 to 738m. The 2 unilateral groups walked (544m) significantly further (P>.05) than did the bilateral amputee (445±104m) and triple amputee (387±99m) groups. All groups demonstrated mean functional mobility scores consistent with scores of either active adults or community ambulators with limb loss. In total, 85% could walk/run independently and 95% could walk and perform activities of daily living independently with an aid/adaptation. No significant difference in mental health outcome was reported between the groups (P>.05). At discharge, 98% of patients were able to control their pain.CONCLUSIONS: Severely injured military amputees who completed intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation achieved levels of physical function comparable with those in age-matched healthy adults. Mental health outcomes were indicative of preparedness for full integration back into society.
LanguageEnglish
Pages2048-2054
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume96
Issue number11
Early online date6 Aug 2015
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1 Nov 2015

Fingerprint

Amputees
Health Status
Mental Health
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation Centers
Injury Severity Score
Activities of Daily Living
Pain
Public Opinion
United Kingdom
Trauma Centers
Anxiety Disorders
Prostheses and Implants
Inpatients
Extremities
Anxiety
Medicine
Depression
Physicians
Health

Keywords

  • Amputees
  • Mental health
  • Outcome assessment (health care)
  • Physical and rehabilitation medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Functional and mental health status of United Kingdom military amputees post-rehabilitation. / Ladlow, Peter; Phillip, Rhodri; Etherington, John; Coppack, Russell; Bilzon, James; McGuigan, M Polly; Bennett, Alexander N.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 96, No. 11, 01.11.2015, p. 2048-2054.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b775faa0bbaf47b9916e9651d7f6fe84,
title = "Functional and mental health status of United Kingdom military amputees post-rehabilitation",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the functional and mental health status of severely injured traumatic amputees from the United Kingdom military at the completion of their rehabilitation pathway and to compare these data with the published normative data.DESIGN: Retrospective independent group comparison of descriptive rehabilitation data recorded postrehabilitation.SETTING: A military complex trauma rehabilitation center.PARTICIPANTS: Amputees (N=65; mean age, 29±6y) were evaluated at the completion of their rehabilitation pathway; of these, 54 were operationally (combat) injured (23 unilateral, 23 bilateral, 8 triple) and 11 nonoperationally injured (all unilateral).INTERVENTIONS: Continuous ∼4-week inpatient, physician-led, interdisciplinary rehabilitation followed by ∼4-weeks of patient-led, home-based rehabilitation.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The New Injury Severity Score at the point of injury was used as the baseline reference. The 6-minute walk test, Amputee Mobility Predictor with Prosthesis, Special Interest Group in Amputee Medicine, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre mobility and activity of daily living scores as well as depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder Scale-7), mental health support, and pain scores were recorded at discharge and compared with the published normative data.RESULTS: The mean New Injury Severity Score was 40±15. After 34±14 months of rehabilitation, amputees achieved a mean 6-minute walk distance of 489±117m compared with age-matched normative distances of 459 to 738m. The 2 unilateral groups walked (544m) significantly further (P>.05) than did the bilateral amputee (445±104m) and triple amputee (387±99m) groups. All groups demonstrated mean functional mobility scores consistent with scores of either active adults or community ambulators with limb loss. In total, 85{\%} could walk/run independently and 95{\%} could walk and perform activities of daily living independently with an aid/adaptation. No significant difference in mental health outcome was reported between the groups (P>.05). At discharge, 98{\%} of patients were able to control their pain.CONCLUSIONS: Severely injured military amputees who completed intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation achieved levels of physical function comparable with those in age-matched healthy adults. Mental health outcomes were indicative of preparedness for full integration back into society.",
keywords = "Amputees, Mental health, Outcome assessment (health care), Physical and rehabilitation medicine, Rehabilitation",
author = "Peter Ladlow and Rhodri Phillip and John Etherington and Russell Coppack and James Bilzon and McGuigan, {M Polly} and Bennett, {Alexander N.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.016",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "2048--2054",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functional and mental health status of United Kingdom military amputees post-rehabilitation

AU - Ladlow, Peter

AU - Phillip, Rhodri

AU - Etherington, John

AU - Coppack, Russell

AU - Bilzon, James

AU - McGuigan, M Polly

AU - Bennett, Alexander N.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the functional and mental health status of severely injured traumatic amputees from the United Kingdom military at the completion of their rehabilitation pathway and to compare these data with the published normative data.DESIGN: Retrospective independent group comparison of descriptive rehabilitation data recorded postrehabilitation.SETTING: A military complex trauma rehabilitation center.PARTICIPANTS: Amputees (N=65; mean age, 29±6y) were evaluated at the completion of their rehabilitation pathway; of these, 54 were operationally (combat) injured (23 unilateral, 23 bilateral, 8 triple) and 11 nonoperationally injured (all unilateral).INTERVENTIONS: Continuous ∼4-week inpatient, physician-led, interdisciplinary rehabilitation followed by ∼4-weeks of patient-led, home-based rehabilitation.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The New Injury Severity Score at the point of injury was used as the baseline reference. The 6-minute walk test, Amputee Mobility Predictor with Prosthesis, Special Interest Group in Amputee Medicine, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre mobility and activity of daily living scores as well as depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder Scale-7), mental health support, and pain scores were recorded at discharge and compared with the published normative data.RESULTS: The mean New Injury Severity Score was 40±15. After 34±14 months of rehabilitation, amputees achieved a mean 6-minute walk distance of 489±117m compared with age-matched normative distances of 459 to 738m. The 2 unilateral groups walked (544m) significantly further (P>.05) than did the bilateral amputee (445±104m) and triple amputee (387±99m) groups. All groups demonstrated mean functional mobility scores consistent with scores of either active adults or community ambulators with limb loss. In total, 85% could walk/run independently and 95% could walk and perform activities of daily living independently with an aid/adaptation. No significant difference in mental health outcome was reported between the groups (P>.05). At discharge, 98% of patients were able to control their pain.CONCLUSIONS: Severely injured military amputees who completed intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation achieved levels of physical function comparable with those in age-matched healthy adults. Mental health outcomes were indicative of preparedness for full integration back into society.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the functional and mental health status of severely injured traumatic amputees from the United Kingdom military at the completion of their rehabilitation pathway and to compare these data with the published normative data.DESIGN: Retrospective independent group comparison of descriptive rehabilitation data recorded postrehabilitation.SETTING: A military complex trauma rehabilitation center.PARTICIPANTS: Amputees (N=65; mean age, 29±6y) were evaluated at the completion of their rehabilitation pathway; of these, 54 were operationally (combat) injured (23 unilateral, 23 bilateral, 8 triple) and 11 nonoperationally injured (all unilateral).INTERVENTIONS: Continuous ∼4-week inpatient, physician-led, interdisciplinary rehabilitation followed by ∼4-weeks of patient-led, home-based rehabilitation.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The New Injury Severity Score at the point of injury was used as the baseline reference. The 6-minute walk test, Amputee Mobility Predictor with Prosthesis, Special Interest Group in Amputee Medicine, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre mobility and activity of daily living scores as well as depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder Scale-7), mental health support, and pain scores were recorded at discharge and compared with the published normative data.RESULTS: The mean New Injury Severity Score was 40±15. After 34±14 months of rehabilitation, amputees achieved a mean 6-minute walk distance of 489±117m compared with age-matched normative distances of 459 to 738m. The 2 unilateral groups walked (544m) significantly further (P>.05) than did the bilateral amputee (445±104m) and triple amputee (387±99m) groups. All groups demonstrated mean functional mobility scores consistent with scores of either active adults or community ambulators with limb loss. In total, 85% could walk/run independently and 95% could walk and perform activities of daily living independently with an aid/adaptation. No significant difference in mental health outcome was reported between the groups (P>.05). At discharge, 98% of patients were able to control their pain.CONCLUSIONS: Severely injured military amputees who completed intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation achieved levels of physical function comparable with those in age-matched healthy adults. Mental health outcomes were indicative of preparedness for full integration back into society.

KW - Amputees

KW - Mental health

KW - Outcome assessment (health care)

KW - Physical and rehabilitation medicine

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946483160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.016

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.016

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.016

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 2048

EP - 2054

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

T2 - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 11

ER -