From the cradle to the grave: Funeral welfare from an international perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

This paper reports on a pilot study examining funeral welfare for citizens from low income backgrounds. Through a review of funeral welfare provision in twelve capitalist democratic countries it seeks to inform the current system of state support in Britain, arguing that insufficient attention has been given to funeral costs as a policy issue. Mindful of the British welfare state’s original ‘cradle to grave’ ethos, such attention is ever more pressing in light of rising funeral costs, an ageing population and projected increases in the death rate. Arguing that funeral costs are an issue of income support, the paper draws on Esping-Andersen’s threefold welfare-regime typology to situate the British system within a comparative study of funeral welfare that identifies similarities and differences both within and between the three welfare-regime types. On the basis of an empirical example, the paper further argues that systems of funeral welfare reflect the relationship between culture, politics and local practice. The findings indicate that the British system is hampered by a discourse of welfare dependency rather than entitlement, which stigmatises those who need support with funeral costs at a time when they are under pressure to ensure that the deceased person receives a ‘dignified’ send-off.
LanguageEnglish
Pages515-536
Number of pages21
JournalSocial Policy and Administration
Volume48
Issue number5
Early online date24 Jan 2013
DOIs
StatusPublished - Oct 2014

Fingerprint

funeral
welfare
cost
welfare provision
income
aging population
costs
typology
comparative study
politics
regime
death rate
welfare state
low income
citizen
human being
discourse

Keywords

  • funeral costs
  • welfare
  • regime types

Cite this

@article{a431a62a94d64c84a33f249c6feae006,
title = "From the cradle to the grave: Funeral welfare from an international perspective",
abstract = "This paper reports on a pilot study examining funeral welfare for citizens from low income backgrounds. Through a review of funeral welfare provision in twelve capitalist democratic countries it seeks to inform the current system of state support in Britain, arguing that insufficient attention has been given to funeral costs as a policy issue. Mindful of the British welfare state’s original ‘cradle to grave’ ethos, such attention is ever more pressing in light of rising funeral costs, an ageing population and projected increases in the death rate. Arguing that funeral costs are an issue of income support, the paper draws on Esping-Andersen’s threefold welfare-regime typology to situate the British system within a comparative study of funeral welfare that identifies similarities and differences both within and between the three welfare-regime types. On the basis of an empirical example, the paper further argues that systems of funeral welfare reflect the relationship between culture, politics and local practice. The findings indicate that the British system is hampered by a discourse of welfare dependency rather than entitlement, which stigmatises those who need support with funeral costs at a time when they are under pressure to ensure that the deceased person receives a ‘dignified’ send-off.",
keywords = "funeral costs, welfare, regime types",
author = "Christine Valentine and Kate Woodthorpe",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/spol.12018",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "515--536",
journal = "Social Policy and Administration",
issn = "0144-5596",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From the cradle to the grave

T2 - Social Policy and Administration

AU - Valentine,Christine

AU - Woodthorpe,Kate

PY - 2014/10

Y1 - 2014/10

N2 - This paper reports on a pilot study examining funeral welfare for citizens from low income backgrounds. Through a review of funeral welfare provision in twelve capitalist democratic countries it seeks to inform the current system of state support in Britain, arguing that insufficient attention has been given to funeral costs as a policy issue. Mindful of the British welfare state’s original ‘cradle to grave’ ethos, such attention is ever more pressing in light of rising funeral costs, an ageing population and projected increases in the death rate. Arguing that funeral costs are an issue of income support, the paper draws on Esping-Andersen’s threefold welfare-regime typology to situate the British system within a comparative study of funeral welfare that identifies similarities and differences both within and between the three welfare-regime types. On the basis of an empirical example, the paper further argues that systems of funeral welfare reflect the relationship between culture, politics and local practice. The findings indicate that the British system is hampered by a discourse of welfare dependency rather than entitlement, which stigmatises those who need support with funeral costs at a time when they are under pressure to ensure that the deceased person receives a ‘dignified’ send-off.

AB - This paper reports on a pilot study examining funeral welfare for citizens from low income backgrounds. Through a review of funeral welfare provision in twelve capitalist democratic countries it seeks to inform the current system of state support in Britain, arguing that insufficient attention has been given to funeral costs as a policy issue. Mindful of the British welfare state’s original ‘cradle to grave’ ethos, such attention is ever more pressing in light of rising funeral costs, an ageing population and projected increases in the death rate. Arguing that funeral costs are an issue of income support, the paper draws on Esping-Andersen’s threefold welfare-regime typology to situate the British system within a comparative study of funeral welfare that identifies similarities and differences both within and between the three welfare-regime types. On the basis of an empirical example, the paper further argues that systems of funeral welfare reflect the relationship between culture, politics and local practice. The findings indicate that the British system is hampered by a discourse of welfare dependency rather than entitlement, which stigmatises those who need support with funeral costs at a time when they are under pressure to ensure that the deceased person receives a ‘dignified’ send-off.

KW - funeral costs

KW - welfare

KW - regime types

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/spol.12018

U2 - 10.1111/spol.12018

DO - 10.1111/spol.12018

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 515

EP - 536

JO - Social Policy and Administration

JF - Social Policy and Administration

SN - 0144-5596

IS - 5

ER -