From pedagogical dialogue to dialogical pedagogy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, I present and analyse two examples of classroom discourse between a teacher and a small group of students in English primary schools. Both transcripts are extracts from discussions which took place during guided reading sessions (part of the prescribed structure of the 'literacy hour' which English primary schools are required to teach). Drawing on concepts from the work of the Bakhtin Circle, I argue that one of the sequences exemplifies 'pedagogical dialogue', in which someone who knows and possesses the truth instructs someone who is ignorant of it and in error. I interpret the second sequence as an instance of 'internally persuasive discouse', in which students are encouraged to retell the story in their own words, rather than reciting it by heart. I conclude that because talk about literary texts is a non-algorithmic form of knowledge, a dialogical pedagogy is better suited to enhancing pupils' independent powers of comprehension than are approaches which emphasise recitation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-296
Number of pages14
JournalLanguage and Education
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000
EventAmerican Educational Research Association Annual Meeting - Seattle, WA.
Duration: 10 Apr 200114 Apr 2001

Fingerprint

primary school
dialogue
small group
pupil
comprehension
student
literacy
classroom
discourse
teacher
Primary School
Pedagogy
Mikhail Bakhtin
Recitation
Literary Text
Classroom Discourse
Pupil
Teaching
Literacy

Cite this

From pedagogical dialogue to dialogical pedagogy. / Skidmore, David.

In: Language and Education, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2000, p. 283-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5b9f0d54e37741359dbe30c69e7e4833,
title = "From pedagogical dialogue to dialogical pedagogy",
abstract = "In this paper, I present and analyse two examples of classroom discourse between a teacher and a small group of students in English primary schools. Both transcripts are extracts from discussions which took place during guided reading sessions (part of the prescribed structure of the 'literacy hour' which English primary schools are required to teach). Drawing on concepts from the work of the Bakhtin Circle, I argue that one of the sequences exemplifies 'pedagogical dialogue', in which someone who knows and possesses the truth instructs someone who is ignorant of it and in error. I interpret the second sequence as an instance of 'internally persuasive discouse', in which students are encouraged to retell the story in their own words, rather than reciting it by heart. I conclude that because talk about literary texts is a non-algorithmic form of knowledge, a dialogical pedagogy is better suited to enhancing pupils' independent powers of comprehension than are approaches which emphasise recitation.",
author = "David Skidmore",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1080/09500780008666794",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "283--296",
journal = "Language and Education",
issn = "0950-0782",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From pedagogical dialogue to dialogical pedagogy

AU - Skidmore, David

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - In this paper, I present and analyse two examples of classroom discourse between a teacher and a small group of students in English primary schools. Both transcripts are extracts from discussions which took place during guided reading sessions (part of the prescribed structure of the 'literacy hour' which English primary schools are required to teach). Drawing on concepts from the work of the Bakhtin Circle, I argue that one of the sequences exemplifies 'pedagogical dialogue', in which someone who knows and possesses the truth instructs someone who is ignorant of it and in error. I interpret the second sequence as an instance of 'internally persuasive discouse', in which students are encouraged to retell the story in their own words, rather than reciting it by heart. I conclude that because talk about literary texts is a non-algorithmic form of knowledge, a dialogical pedagogy is better suited to enhancing pupils' independent powers of comprehension than are approaches which emphasise recitation.

AB - In this paper, I present and analyse two examples of classroom discourse between a teacher and a small group of students in English primary schools. Both transcripts are extracts from discussions which took place during guided reading sessions (part of the prescribed structure of the 'literacy hour' which English primary schools are required to teach). Drawing on concepts from the work of the Bakhtin Circle, I argue that one of the sequences exemplifies 'pedagogical dialogue', in which someone who knows and possesses the truth instructs someone who is ignorant of it and in error. I interpret the second sequence as an instance of 'internally persuasive discouse', in which students are encouraged to retell the story in their own words, rather than reciting it by heart. I conclude that because talk about literary texts is a non-algorithmic form of knowledge, a dialogical pedagogy is better suited to enhancing pupils' independent powers of comprehension than are approaches which emphasise recitation.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500780008666794

U2 - 10.1080/09500780008666794

DO - 10.1080/09500780008666794

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 283

EP - 296

JO - Language and Education

JF - Language and Education

SN - 0950-0782

IS - 4

ER -