Abstract
Policy towards microfinance has undergone a shift away from building financial institutions focused on serving poor people to an “inclusive” agenda for financial sector development, operationalized by some donors in an approach entitled “Making Markets Work for the Poor”. This approach is located in New Institutional Economics and the enabling environment focus of the post-Washington Consensus. Despite the way in which this inclusion agenda echoes social exclusion discourse, it engages with a residualist rather than relational understanding of poverty. This leads to an analytical disjuncture between its discourse and analysis, overlooking the root causes of poverty and exclusion in relational processes. Arising from this is the failure to recognize that developing institutions and “enabling” environments require an understanding of social institutions and their influence as social regulatory structures. The author illustrates how analysis can proceed to address this disjuncture using the example of gender relations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | S35-S52 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Oxford Development Studies |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | S1 |
| Early online date | 26 Oct 2012 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From microfinance to inclusive financial markets: The challenge of social regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS