France, Britain and the Euro-Atlantic Crisis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Franco-British relations have always been central to the fortunes both of the transatlantic partnership and of the European security and defence project (ESDP). Although fraught with ambivalence in the years after the 1998 Saint-Malo summit, the Franco-British partnership pushed ESDP forward. In 2003, however, France and the UK defined two extremes in their approaches both to war in Iraq and to relations with the US. Neither approach makes strategic sense. France's apparent principled opposition will only serve to divide the EU into largely artificial pro- and anti-American camps. The UK's apparent unconditional alignment will only serve to confine it to the margins of European policymaking in an area - diplomacy and security - where Britain can and must play a leading role. Only if both countries agree to adopt, along with all their partners, a new and more subtle policy of quiet, unified and critical dialogue with Washington can the EU have the kind of transatlantic impact that both profess to seek.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-192
Number of pages20
JournalSurvival
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2003

Fingerprint

European security
EU
France
diplomacy
ambivalence
Iraq
opposition
dialogue

Cite this

France, Britain and the Euro-Atlantic Crisis. / Howorth, J M.

In: Survival, Vol. 45, No. 4, 11.2003, p. 173-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Howorth, J M. / France, Britain and the Euro-Atlantic Crisis. In: Survival. 2003 ; Vol. 45, No. 4. pp. 173-192.
@article{5a391544c2d742498b2292eecbc4ae4c,
title = "France, Britain and the Euro-Atlantic Crisis",
abstract = "Franco-British relations have always been central to the fortunes both of the transatlantic partnership and of the European security and defence project (ESDP). Although fraught with ambivalence in the years after the 1998 Saint-Malo summit, the Franco-British partnership pushed ESDP forward. In 2003, however, France and the UK defined two extremes in their approaches both to war in Iraq and to relations with the US. Neither approach makes strategic sense. France's apparent principled opposition will only serve to divide the EU into largely artificial pro- and anti-American camps. The UK's apparent unconditional alignment will only serve to confine it to the margins of European policymaking in an area - diplomacy and security - where Britain can and must play a leading role. Only if both countries agree to adopt, along with all their partners, a new and more subtle policy of quiet, unified and critical dialogue with Washington can the EU have the kind of transatlantic impact that both profess to seek.",
author = "Howorth, {J M}",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1093/survival/45.4.173",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "173--192",
journal = "Survival",
issn = "0039-6338",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - France, Britain and the Euro-Atlantic Crisis

AU - Howorth, J M

PY - 2003/11

Y1 - 2003/11

N2 - Franco-British relations have always been central to the fortunes both of the transatlantic partnership and of the European security and defence project (ESDP). Although fraught with ambivalence in the years after the 1998 Saint-Malo summit, the Franco-British partnership pushed ESDP forward. In 2003, however, France and the UK defined two extremes in their approaches both to war in Iraq and to relations with the US. Neither approach makes strategic sense. France's apparent principled opposition will only serve to divide the EU into largely artificial pro- and anti-American camps. The UK's apparent unconditional alignment will only serve to confine it to the margins of European policymaking in an area - diplomacy and security - where Britain can and must play a leading role. Only if both countries agree to adopt, along with all their partners, a new and more subtle policy of quiet, unified and critical dialogue with Washington can the EU have the kind of transatlantic impact that both profess to seek.

AB - Franco-British relations have always been central to the fortunes both of the transatlantic partnership and of the European security and defence project (ESDP). Although fraught with ambivalence in the years after the 1998 Saint-Malo summit, the Franco-British partnership pushed ESDP forward. In 2003, however, France and the UK defined two extremes in their approaches both to war in Iraq and to relations with the US. Neither approach makes strategic sense. France's apparent principled opposition will only serve to divide the EU into largely artificial pro- and anti-American camps. The UK's apparent unconditional alignment will only serve to confine it to the margins of European policymaking in an area - diplomacy and security - where Britain can and must play a leading role. Only if both countries agree to adopt, along with all their partners, a new and more subtle policy of quiet, unified and critical dialogue with Washington can the EU have the kind of transatlantic impact that both profess to seek.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/survival/45.4.173

U2 - 10.1093/survival/45.4.173

DO - 10.1093/survival/45.4.173

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 173

EP - 192

JO - Survival

JF - Survival

SN - 0039-6338

IS - 4

ER -