Framing the policy debate over spirits excise tax in Poland

Mateusz Zatonski, Benjamin Hawkins, Martin McKee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Industry lobbying remains an obstacle to effective health-oriented alcohol policy. In 2013, an increase in excise tax on spirits was announced by the Polish government. This article presents a qualitative analysis of the public debate that ensued on the potential economic, health and social effects of the policy. It focuses on how competing groups, including industry actors, framed their position and sought to dominate the debate. Online archives of five Polish national newspapers, two spirits trade associations, and parliamentary and ministerial archives were searched. A thematic content analysis of the identified sources was conducted. The overall findings were compared with existing research on the framing of the Minimum Unit Pricing (MUP) debate in the UK. A total of 155 sources were analysed. Two main frames were identified: health, and economic. The spirits industry successfully promoted the economic frame in their own publications and in the media. The debate was dominated by arguments about potential growth of the grey market and losses in tax revenue that might result from the excise tax increase. The framing of the debate in Poland differed from the framing of the MUP debate in the United Kingdom. The Polish public health community was unsuccessful in making health considerations a significant element of the alcohol policy debate. The strategies pursued by UK health advocates offer lessons for how to make a more substantial impact on media coverage and promote health-oriented legislation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)515-524
Number of pages10
JournalHealth Promotion International
Volume33
Issue number3
Early online date7 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Framing the policy debate over spirits excise tax in Poland. / Zatonski, Mateusz; Hawkins, Benjamin; McKee, Martin.

In: Health Promotion International, Vol. 33, No. 3, 01.06.2018, p. 515-524.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zatonski, Mateusz ; Hawkins, Benjamin ; McKee, Martin. / Framing the policy debate over spirits excise tax in Poland. In: Health Promotion International. 2018 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 515-524.
@article{f2d3d7b3300f4fd596a323dd75580e03,
title = "Framing the policy debate over spirits excise tax in Poland",
abstract = "Industry lobbying remains an obstacle to effective health-oriented alcohol policy. In 2013, an increase in excise tax on spirits was announced by the Polish government. This article presents a qualitative analysis of the public debate that ensued on the potential economic, health and social effects of the policy. It focuses on how competing groups, including industry actors, framed their position and sought to dominate the debate. Online archives of five Polish national newspapers, two spirits trade associations, and parliamentary and ministerial archives were searched. A thematic content analysis of the identified sources was conducted. The overall findings were compared with existing research on the framing of the Minimum Unit Pricing (MUP) debate in the UK. A total of 155 sources were analysed. Two main frames were identified: health, and economic. The spirits industry successfully promoted the economic frame in their own publications and in the media. The debate was dominated by arguments about potential growth of the grey market and losses in tax revenue that might result from the excise tax increase. The framing of the debate in Poland differed from the framing of the MUP debate in the United Kingdom. The Polish public health community was unsuccessful in making health considerations a significant element of the alcohol policy debate. The strategies pursued by UK health advocates offer lessons for how to make a more substantial impact on media coverage and promote health-oriented legislation.",
author = "Mateusz Zatonski and Benjamin Hawkins and Martin McKee",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/heapro/daw093",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "515--524",
journal = "Health Promotion International",
issn = "0957-4824",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Framing the policy debate over spirits excise tax in Poland

AU - Zatonski, Mateusz

AU - Hawkins, Benjamin

AU - McKee, Martin

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Industry lobbying remains an obstacle to effective health-oriented alcohol policy. In 2013, an increase in excise tax on spirits was announced by the Polish government. This article presents a qualitative analysis of the public debate that ensued on the potential economic, health and social effects of the policy. It focuses on how competing groups, including industry actors, framed their position and sought to dominate the debate. Online archives of five Polish national newspapers, two spirits trade associations, and parliamentary and ministerial archives were searched. A thematic content analysis of the identified sources was conducted. The overall findings were compared with existing research on the framing of the Minimum Unit Pricing (MUP) debate in the UK. A total of 155 sources were analysed. Two main frames were identified: health, and economic. The spirits industry successfully promoted the economic frame in their own publications and in the media. The debate was dominated by arguments about potential growth of the grey market and losses in tax revenue that might result from the excise tax increase. The framing of the debate in Poland differed from the framing of the MUP debate in the United Kingdom. The Polish public health community was unsuccessful in making health considerations a significant element of the alcohol policy debate. The strategies pursued by UK health advocates offer lessons for how to make a more substantial impact on media coverage and promote health-oriented legislation.

AB - Industry lobbying remains an obstacle to effective health-oriented alcohol policy. In 2013, an increase in excise tax on spirits was announced by the Polish government. This article presents a qualitative analysis of the public debate that ensued on the potential economic, health and social effects of the policy. It focuses on how competing groups, including industry actors, framed their position and sought to dominate the debate. Online archives of five Polish national newspapers, two spirits trade associations, and parliamentary and ministerial archives were searched. A thematic content analysis of the identified sources was conducted. The overall findings were compared with existing research on the framing of the Minimum Unit Pricing (MUP) debate in the UK. A total of 155 sources were analysed. Two main frames were identified: health, and economic. The spirits industry successfully promoted the economic frame in their own publications and in the media. The debate was dominated by arguments about potential growth of the grey market and losses in tax revenue that might result from the excise tax increase. The framing of the debate in Poland differed from the framing of the MUP debate in the United Kingdom. The Polish public health community was unsuccessful in making health considerations a significant element of the alcohol policy debate. The strategies pursued by UK health advocates offer lessons for how to make a more substantial impact on media coverage and promote health-oriented legislation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051097374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/heapro/daw093

DO - 10.1093/heapro/daw093

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 515

EP - 524

JO - Health Promotion International

JF - Health Promotion International

SN - 0957-4824

IS - 3

ER -