Framing in literary energy narratives

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This essay is part of a wider project exploring the ability of frame analysis to serve as a common methodology for the description and analysis of oral, media, historical and literary stories about energy. It investigates the application of framing to literary texts depicting and reflecting on our changing use of energy. Taking as starting point the conception and typology of frames in Gamson and Modigliani’s study of attitudes towards nuclear energy in the American media (1989), it experiments with the identification of framing mechanisms and frames in three English novels. The first is Jim Crace’s recent historical novel, Harvest (2013), a tale of enclosure in the sixteenth century; the second Charles Dickens’s Hard Times (1854), one of the best-known depictions of the Industrial Revolution by a contemporary. The third novel, which is examined in greater depth, is Ian McEwan’s account of the challenge posed by the transition to renewable energy today in Solar (2010). If the danger of a reductive categorisation of novels according to master frames is to be avoided, the complexity and ambivalence of framing which typify novels in comparison with media texts mean that caution and sensitivity are demanded in approaching narrative strategies which can involve multiple, conflicting framings and merely implicit narrative perspectives. With this caveat, it is, however, argued that the focus on framing foregrounds neglected aspects of literary narration, and gives new insight into similarities and differences between literary and non-literary stories, and hence the part played by literature in energy debates.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationFraming the Environmental Humanities
EditorsHannes Bergthaller, Peter Mortensen
Place of PublicationLeiden, Boston
PublisherBrill | Rodopi
Pages15-33
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9789004360488
ISBN (Print)9789004358843
StatusPublished - 15 Feb 2018

Publication series

NameStudies in Environmental Humanities
Volume5

Fingerprint

Energy
Novel
Enclosure
English Novel
Harvest
Historical Novel
Narrative Strategies
Methodology
Conception
Industrial Revolution
Literary Text
Narration
Ambivalence
Ian McEwan
Experiment
Charles Dickens
Danger
Frame Analysis

Keywords

  • Jim Crace, Charles Dickens, Ian McEwan, Energy narrative, Frame analysis,
  • Metaphor

Cite this

Goodbody, A. (2018). Framing in literary energy narratives. In H. Bergthaller, & P. Mortensen (Eds.), Framing the Environmental Humanities (pp. 15-33). (Studies in Environmental Humanities; Vol. 5). Leiden, Boston: Brill | Rodopi.

Framing in literary energy narratives. / Goodbody, Axel.

Framing the Environmental Humanities. ed. / Hannes Bergthaller; Peter Mortensen. Leiden, Boston : Brill | Rodopi, 2018. p. 15-33 (Studies in Environmental Humanities; Vol. 5).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Goodbody, A 2018, Framing in literary energy narratives. in H Bergthaller & P Mortensen (eds), Framing the Environmental Humanities. Studies in Environmental Humanities, vol. 5, Brill | Rodopi, Leiden, Boston, pp. 15-33.
Goodbody A. Framing in literary energy narratives. In Bergthaller H, Mortensen P, editors, Framing the Environmental Humanities. Leiden, Boston: Brill | Rodopi. 2018. p. 15-33. (Studies in Environmental Humanities).
Goodbody, Axel. / Framing in literary energy narratives. Framing the Environmental Humanities. editor / Hannes Bergthaller ; Peter Mortensen. Leiden, Boston : Brill | Rodopi, 2018. pp. 15-33 (Studies in Environmental Humanities).
@inbook{b4dae9388a354905b3697d462e4922e4,
title = "Framing in literary energy narratives",
abstract = "This essay is part of a wider project exploring the ability of frame analysis to serve as a common methodology for the description and analysis of oral, media, historical and literary stories about energy. It investigates the application of framing to literary texts depicting and reflecting on our changing use of energy. Taking as starting point the conception and typology of frames in Gamson and Modigliani’s study of attitudes towards nuclear energy in the American media (1989), it experiments with the identification of framing mechanisms and frames in three English novels. The first is Jim Crace’s recent historical novel, Harvest (2013), a tale of enclosure in the sixteenth century; the second Charles Dickens’s Hard Times (1854), one of the best-known depictions of the Industrial Revolution by a contemporary. The third novel, which is examined in greater depth, is Ian McEwan’s account of the challenge posed by the transition to renewable energy today in Solar (2010). If the danger of a reductive categorisation of novels according to master frames is to be avoided, the complexity and ambivalence of framing which typify novels in comparison with media texts mean that caution and sensitivity are demanded in approaching narrative strategies which can involve multiple, conflicting framings and merely implicit narrative perspectives. With this caveat, it is, however, argued that the focus on framing foregrounds neglected aspects of literary narration, and gives new insight into similarities and differences between literary and non-literary stories, and hence the part played by literature in energy debates.",
keywords = "Jim Crace, Charles Dickens, Ian McEwan, Energy narrative, Frame analysis, , Metaphor",
author = "Axel Goodbody",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "15",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789004358843",
series = "Studies in Environmental Humanities",
publisher = "Brill | Rodopi",
pages = "15--33",
editor = "Hannes Bergthaller and Mortensen, {Peter }",
booktitle = "Framing the Environmental Humanities",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Framing in literary energy narratives

AU - Goodbody, Axel

PY - 2018/2/15

Y1 - 2018/2/15

N2 - This essay is part of a wider project exploring the ability of frame analysis to serve as a common methodology for the description and analysis of oral, media, historical and literary stories about energy. It investigates the application of framing to literary texts depicting and reflecting on our changing use of energy. Taking as starting point the conception and typology of frames in Gamson and Modigliani’s study of attitudes towards nuclear energy in the American media (1989), it experiments with the identification of framing mechanisms and frames in three English novels. The first is Jim Crace’s recent historical novel, Harvest (2013), a tale of enclosure in the sixteenth century; the second Charles Dickens’s Hard Times (1854), one of the best-known depictions of the Industrial Revolution by a contemporary. The third novel, which is examined in greater depth, is Ian McEwan’s account of the challenge posed by the transition to renewable energy today in Solar (2010). If the danger of a reductive categorisation of novels according to master frames is to be avoided, the complexity and ambivalence of framing which typify novels in comparison with media texts mean that caution and sensitivity are demanded in approaching narrative strategies which can involve multiple, conflicting framings and merely implicit narrative perspectives. With this caveat, it is, however, argued that the focus on framing foregrounds neglected aspects of literary narration, and gives new insight into similarities and differences between literary and non-literary stories, and hence the part played by literature in energy debates.

AB - This essay is part of a wider project exploring the ability of frame analysis to serve as a common methodology for the description and analysis of oral, media, historical and literary stories about energy. It investigates the application of framing to literary texts depicting and reflecting on our changing use of energy. Taking as starting point the conception and typology of frames in Gamson and Modigliani’s study of attitudes towards nuclear energy in the American media (1989), it experiments with the identification of framing mechanisms and frames in three English novels. The first is Jim Crace’s recent historical novel, Harvest (2013), a tale of enclosure in the sixteenth century; the second Charles Dickens’s Hard Times (1854), one of the best-known depictions of the Industrial Revolution by a contemporary. The third novel, which is examined in greater depth, is Ian McEwan’s account of the challenge posed by the transition to renewable energy today in Solar (2010). If the danger of a reductive categorisation of novels according to master frames is to be avoided, the complexity and ambivalence of framing which typify novels in comparison with media texts mean that caution and sensitivity are demanded in approaching narrative strategies which can involve multiple, conflicting framings and merely implicit narrative perspectives. With this caveat, it is, however, argued that the focus on framing foregrounds neglected aspects of literary narration, and gives new insight into similarities and differences between literary and non-literary stories, and hence the part played by literature in energy debates.

KW - Jim Crace, Charles Dickens, Ian McEwan, Energy narrative, Frame analysis,

KW - Metaphor

UR - https://brill.com/view/title/36037

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789004358843

T3 - Studies in Environmental Humanities

SP - 15

EP - 33

BT - Framing the Environmental Humanities

A2 - Bergthaller, Hannes

A2 - Mortensen, Peter

PB - Brill | Rodopi

CY - Leiden, Boston

ER -