Framing AIDS in times of global crisis

‘Wasting’ Africa yet again?

Wiebe Nauta, Ludek Stavinoha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

After some hope from the mid-2000s onwards, when unprecedented resources were mobilized to provide life-saving treatment to the millions dying from HIV/AIDS in the global South, donors are reneging on their promises, bowing to the imperative of austerity of a self-inflicted economic crisis. Drawing on Galtung's typology of structural and cultural violence, this article examines how the rules and norms of global governance have shaped the context of policy responses to the pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa, and how these material struggles are intimately bound up with struggles over the frames through which the disease is portrayed and perceived by key policy actors and the public. First, we argue that the strikingly differential global distribution of the disease is, at least partially, attributable to the structural violence of Africa's encounter with neoliberal capitalism. Second, we focus on two dominant frames—behavioral and philanthrocapitalist—and examine how they contributed to a depoliticization of the AIDS crisis, negating the counter-framing work of transnational AIDS activism. The latter, which has done so much to unmask our shared responsibility for the unequal distribution of vulnerability and death, is critical to countering the threat the economic crisis poses to the global HIV/AIDS response.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)695-711
Number of pages17
JournalGlobalizations
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

acquired immune deficiency syndrome
AIDS
human immunodeficiency virus
violence
economic crisis
Disease
structural violence
global governance
capitalism
dying
economics
typology
capitalist society
vulnerability
threat
death
responsibility
time
Africa
Global crisis

Cite this

Framing AIDS in times of global crisis : ‘Wasting’ Africa yet again? / Nauta, Wiebe; Stavinoha, Ludek.

In: Globalizations, Vol. 9, No. 5, 10.2012, p. 695-711.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nauta, Wiebe ; Stavinoha, Ludek. / Framing AIDS in times of global crisis : ‘Wasting’ Africa yet again?. In: Globalizations. 2012 ; Vol. 9, No. 5. pp. 695-711.
@article{4a28a9967f6d49f9811ea67eb284cd74,
title = "Framing AIDS in times of global crisis: ‘Wasting’ Africa yet again?",
abstract = "After some hope from the mid-2000s onwards, when unprecedented resources were mobilized to provide life-saving treatment to the millions dying from HIV/AIDS in the global South, donors are reneging on their promises, bowing to the imperative of austerity of a self-inflicted economic crisis. Drawing on Galtung's typology of structural and cultural violence, this article examines how the rules and norms of global governance have shaped the context of policy responses to the pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa, and how these material struggles are intimately bound up with struggles over the frames through which the disease is portrayed and perceived by key policy actors and the public. First, we argue that the strikingly differential global distribution of the disease is, at least partially, attributable to the structural violence of Africa's encounter with neoliberal capitalism. Second, we focus on two dominant frames—behavioral and philanthrocapitalist—and examine how they contributed to a depoliticization of the AIDS crisis, negating the counter-framing work of transnational AIDS activism. The latter, which has done so much to unmask our shared responsibility for the unequal distribution of vulnerability and death, is critical to countering the threat the economic crisis poses to the global HIV/AIDS response.",
author = "Wiebe Nauta and Ludek Stavinoha",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1080/14747731.2012.732436",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "695--711",
journal = "Globalizations",
issn = "1474-7731",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Framing AIDS in times of global crisis

T2 - ‘Wasting’ Africa yet again?

AU - Nauta, Wiebe

AU - Stavinoha, Ludek

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - After some hope from the mid-2000s onwards, when unprecedented resources were mobilized to provide life-saving treatment to the millions dying from HIV/AIDS in the global South, donors are reneging on their promises, bowing to the imperative of austerity of a self-inflicted economic crisis. Drawing on Galtung's typology of structural and cultural violence, this article examines how the rules and norms of global governance have shaped the context of policy responses to the pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa, and how these material struggles are intimately bound up with struggles over the frames through which the disease is portrayed and perceived by key policy actors and the public. First, we argue that the strikingly differential global distribution of the disease is, at least partially, attributable to the structural violence of Africa's encounter with neoliberal capitalism. Second, we focus on two dominant frames—behavioral and philanthrocapitalist—and examine how they contributed to a depoliticization of the AIDS crisis, negating the counter-framing work of transnational AIDS activism. The latter, which has done so much to unmask our shared responsibility for the unequal distribution of vulnerability and death, is critical to countering the threat the economic crisis poses to the global HIV/AIDS response.

AB - After some hope from the mid-2000s onwards, when unprecedented resources were mobilized to provide life-saving treatment to the millions dying from HIV/AIDS in the global South, donors are reneging on their promises, bowing to the imperative of austerity of a self-inflicted economic crisis. Drawing on Galtung's typology of structural and cultural violence, this article examines how the rules and norms of global governance have shaped the context of policy responses to the pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa, and how these material struggles are intimately bound up with struggles over the frames through which the disease is portrayed and perceived by key policy actors and the public. First, we argue that the strikingly differential global distribution of the disease is, at least partially, attributable to the structural violence of Africa's encounter with neoliberal capitalism. Second, we focus on two dominant frames—behavioral and philanthrocapitalist—and examine how they contributed to a depoliticization of the AIDS crisis, negating the counter-framing work of transnational AIDS activism. The latter, which has done so much to unmask our shared responsibility for the unequal distribution of vulnerability and death, is critical to countering the threat the economic crisis poses to the global HIV/AIDS response.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870062972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2012.732436

U2 - 10.1080/14747731.2012.732436

DO - 10.1080/14747731.2012.732436

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 695

EP - 711

JO - Globalizations

JF - Globalizations

SN - 1474-7731

IS - 5

ER -