Forecast selection and representativeness

Fotios Petropoulos, Enno Siemsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

74 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Effective approaches to forecast model selection are crucial to improve forecast accuracy and to facilitate the use of forecasts for decision-making processes. Information criteria or cross-validation are common approaches of forecast model selection. Both methods compare forecasts with the respective actual realizations. However, no existing selection method assesses out-of-sample forecasts before the actual values become available—a technique used in human judgment in this context. Research in judgmental model selection emphasizes that human judgment can be superior to statistical selection procedures in evaluating the quality of forecasting models. We, therefore, propose a new way of statistical model selection based on these insights from human judgment. Our approach relies on an asynchronous comparison of forecasts and actual values, allowing for an ex ante evaluation of forecasts via representativeness. We test this criterion on numerous time series. Results from our analyses provide evidence that forecast performance can be improved when models are selected based on their representativeness.
Original languageEnglish
JournalManagement Science
Early online date18 Jul 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Jul 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Forecast selection and representativeness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this