TY - JOUR
T1 - Focused wave interactions with floating structures
T2 - a blind comparative study
AU - Ransley, Edward
AU - Brown, Scott
AU - Hann, Martyn
AU - Greaves, D
AU - Windt, Christian
AU - Ringwood, John
AU - Chen, Qiang
AU - Ding, Haoyu
AU - Zang, Jun
AU - Bingham, Harry
PY - 2021/3/31
Y1 - 2021/3/31
N2 - The paper presents results from the Collaborative Computational Project in Wave Structure Interaction (CCP-WSI) Blind Test Series 2. Without prior access to the physical data, participants, with numerical methods ranging from low-fidelity linear models to fully non-linear Navier–Stokes (NS) solvers, simulate the interaction between focused wave events and two separate, taut-moored, floating structures: a hemispherical-bottomed cylinder and a cylinder with a moonpool. The ‘blind’ numerical predictions for heave, surge, pitch and mooring load, are compared against physical measurements. Dynamic time warping is used to quantify the predictive capability of participating methods. In general, NS solvers and hybrid methods give more accurate predictions; however, heave amplitude is predicted reasonably well by all methods; and a WEC-Sim implementation, with CFD-informed viscous terms, demonstrates comparable predictive capability to even the stronger NS solvers. Large variations in the solutions are observed (even among similar methods), highlighting a need for standardisation in the numerical modelling of WSI problems.
AB - The paper presents results from the Collaborative Computational Project in Wave Structure Interaction (CCP-WSI) Blind Test Series 2. Without prior access to the physical data, participants, with numerical methods ranging from low-fidelity linear models to fully non-linear Navier–Stokes (NS) solvers, simulate the interaction between focused wave events and two separate, taut-moored, floating structures: a hemispherical-bottomed cylinder and a cylinder with a moonpool. The ‘blind’ numerical predictions for heave, surge, pitch and mooring load, are compared against physical measurements. Dynamic time warping is used to quantify the predictive capability of participating methods. In general, NS solvers and hybrid methods give more accurate predictions; however, heave amplitude is predicted reasonably well by all methods; and a WEC-Sim implementation, with CFD-informed viscous terms, demonstrates comparable predictive capability to even the stronger NS solvers. Large variations in the solutions are observed (even among similar methods), highlighting a need for standardisation in the numerical modelling of WSI problems.
U2 - 10.1680/jencm.20.00006
DO - 10.1680/jencm.20.00006
M3 - Article
SN - 1755-0777
VL - 174
SP - 46
EP - 61
JO - Proceedings of the ICE-Engineering and Computational Mechanics
JF - Proceedings of the ICE-Engineering and Computational Mechanics
IS - 1
ER -