fMRI evidence for procedural invariance underlying gambling preference reversals

Neal S. Hinvest, Mark J. Brosnan, Robert D. Rogers, Timothy L. Hodgson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Preference reversals (PRs) occur when one's preferences over the same items change depending upon how one is asked to construct a preference. PRs are a robust phenomenon that lead to suboptimal real-world decision making. Despite this, it remains unclear why PRs occur. This study investigated whether biological procedural invariance (i.e., different procedures are associated with different underlying mechanisms) could elucidate why PRs occur. Seventeen participants were scanned via functional MRI (fMRI) while (a) expressing preferences between 2 probabilistic wins or 2 probabilistic losses (1 high and 1 low magnitude) and, (b) reporting a monetary amount (valuation) according to how much they wanted to sell a potential winning gamble for or how much they would pay to forgo a potential loss. Participants' valuations closely followed expected value. Choice behavior, however, was more prone to bias because of unequal weighting of either magnitude or probability. Preference formation during both valuation and choice was associated with fronto-parietal neural activity. Within this system, valuation was associated with greater activity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and caudal anterior cingulate cortex, while choice was associated with greater activity in the insula, horizontal inferior parietal sulcus, posterior cingulate cortex, and somatosensory cortex. The combination of behavioral and neuroimaging data may suggest that participants used a mathematical approach to formation of valuations but choices were subject to emotional influence. These findings may provide support for a biological procedural invariance view of gambling preference reversal. These findings are difficult to accommodate within explanations that rely on modifications to expected utility and prospect theory
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)48-63
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Gambling
Gyrus Cinguli
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Choice Behavior
Somatosensory Cortex
Prefrontal Cortex
Neuroimaging
Decision Making
Economics
Invariance
Preference reversal

Keywords

  • Choice
  • Emotion
  • fMRI
  • Neuroeconomics
  • Preference

Cite this

fMRI evidence for procedural invariance underlying gambling preference reversals. / Hinvest, Neal S.; Brosnan, Mark J.; Rogers, Robert D.; Hodgson, Timothy L.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.03.2014, p. 48-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{03f04fb0c3474589bce5b4b543d0aefc,
title = "fMRI evidence for procedural invariance underlying gambling preference reversals",
abstract = "Preference reversals (PRs) occur when one's preferences over the same items change depending upon how one is asked to construct a preference. PRs are a robust phenomenon that lead to suboptimal real-world decision making. Despite this, it remains unclear why PRs occur. This study investigated whether biological procedural invariance (i.e., different procedures are associated with different underlying mechanisms) could elucidate why PRs occur. Seventeen participants were scanned via functional MRI (fMRI) while (a) expressing preferences between 2 probabilistic wins or 2 probabilistic losses (1 high and 1 low magnitude) and, (b) reporting a monetary amount (valuation) according to how much they wanted to sell a potential winning gamble for or how much they would pay to forgo a potential loss. Participants' valuations closely followed expected value. Choice behavior, however, was more prone to bias because of unequal weighting of either magnitude or probability. Preference formation during both valuation and choice was associated with fronto-parietal neural activity. Within this system, valuation was associated with greater activity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and caudal anterior cingulate cortex, while choice was associated with greater activity in the insula, horizontal inferior parietal sulcus, posterior cingulate cortex, and somatosensory cortex. The combination of behavioral and neuroimaging data may suggest that participants used a mathematical approach to formation of valuations but choices were subject to emotional influence. These findings may provide support for a biological procedural invariance view of gambling preference reversal. These findings are difficult to accommodate within explanations that rely on modifications to expected utility and prospect theory",
keywords = "Choice, Emotion, fMRI, Neuroeconomics, Preference",
author = "Hinvest, {Neal S.} and Brosnan, {Mark J.} and Rogers, {Robert D.} and Hodgson, {Timothy L.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/npe0000007",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "48--63",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics",
issn = "1937-321X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - fMRI evidence for procedural invariance underlying gambling preference reversals

AU - Hinvest, Neal S.

AU - Brosnan, Mark J.

AU - Rogers, Robert D.

AU - Hodgson, Timothy L.

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - Preference reversals (PRs) occur when one's preferences over the same items change depending upon how one is asked to construct a preference. PRs are a robust phenomenon that lead to suboptimal real-world decision making. Despite this, it remains unclear why PRs occur. This study investigated whether biological procedural invariance (i.e., different procedures are associated with different underlying mechanisms) could elucidate why PRs occur. Seventeen participants were scanned via functional MRI (fMRI) while (a) expressing preferences between 2 probabilistic wins or 2 probabilistic losses (1 high and 1 low magnitude) and, (b) reporting a monetary amount (valuation) according to how much they wanted to sell a potential winning gamble for or how much they would pay to forgo a potential loss. Participants' valuations closely followed expected value. Choice behavior, however, was more prone to bias because of unequal weighting of either magnitude or probability. Preference formation during both valuation and choice was associated with fronto-parietal neural activity. Within this system, valuation was associated with greater activity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and caudal anterior cingulate cortex, while choice was associated with greater activity in the insula, horizontal inferior parietal sulcus, posterior cingulate cortex, and somatosensory cortex. The combination of behavioral and neuroimaging data may suggest that participants used a mathematical approach to formation of valuations but choices were subject to emotional influence. These findings may provide support for a biological procedural invariance view of gambling preference reversal. These findings are difficult to accommodate within explanations that rely on modifications to expected utility and prospect theory

AB - Preference reversals (PRs) occur when one's preferences over the same items change depending upon how one is asked to construct a preference. PRs are a robust phenomenon that lead to suboptimal real-world decision making. Despite this, it remains unclear why PRs occur. This study investigated whether biological procedural invariance (i.e., different procedures are associated with different underlying mechanisms) could elucidate why PRs occur. Seventeen participants were scanned via functional MRI (fMRI) while (a) expressing preferences between 2 probabilistic wins or 2 probabilistic losses (1 high and 1 low magnitude) and, (b) reporting a monetary amount (valuation) according to how much they wanted to sell a potential winning gamble for or how much they would pay to forgo a potential loss. Participants' valuations closely followed expected value. Choice behavior, however, was more prone to bias because of unequal weighting of either magnitude or probability. Preference formation during both valuation and choice was associated with fronto-parietal neural activity. Within this system, valuation was associated with greater activity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and caudal anterior cingulate cortex, while choice was associated with greater activity in the insula, horizontal inferior parietal sulcus, posterior cingulate cortex, and somatosensory cortex. The combination of behavioral and neuroimaging data may suggest that participants used a mathematical approach to formation of valuations but choices were subject to emotional influence. These findings may provide support for a biological procedural invariance view of gambling preference reversal. These findings are difficult to accommodate within explanations that rely on modifications to expected utility and prospect theory

KW - Choice

KW - Emotion

KW - fMRI

KW - Neuroeconomics

KW - Preference

U2 - 10.1037/npe0000007

DO - 10.1037/npe0000007

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 48

EP - 63

JO - Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics

JF - Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics

SN - 1937-321X

IS - 1

ER -