Flipping Methodology: Or, errancy in the meanwhile and the need to remove doors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (SciVal)
134 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article ponders two questions: What does “postqualitative” mean to you? Why do you think the “postqualitative” movement is important to the field of qualitative inquiry? In response, it poses a method/ology of errancy—a flipping methodology—that locates postqualitative research as an ethico-onto-epistemological political project of opening theory-practice spaces for differential matterings. Postqualitative flipping is not an individual undertaking, it is an ecology of practices, a resonation across bodies, a navigating of movement for a politics of change, in which even barely perceptible shifts possibilize new modes of thinking and unthinking, doing and undoing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-238
Number of pages4
JournalQualitative Inquiry
Volume27
Issue number2
Early online date12 Aug 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2021

Keywords

  • errancy
  • flipping methodology
  • hospitality
  • postqualitative
  • visitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Flipping Methodology: Or, errancy in the meanwhile and the need to remove doors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this