Fiscal policy with banks and financial frictions

Panagiotis Asimakopoulos, Stylianos Asimakopoulos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We assess the role of banks to the transmission of optimal and exogenous changes in fiscal policy to the economy. We built-up a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with patient and impatient agents, banks and a government to find that banks and their associated capital-adequacy constraint mitigate the negative spill-over effects to the economy from higher taxes. Specifically, we confirm that labour income tax is the most distortionary fiscal instrument. The optimal choice of a housing tax is the most favorable funding source to a temporary increase in public spending. The combination of housing and labour taxes is the most preferred tax bundle to be optimally chosen under negative output shocks. Moreover, a permanent increase in housing tax is beneficial if it is welfare enhancing and the existence of banks benefits mainly impatient households under permanently higher consumption taxes. Finally, these results remain robust to various robustness checks.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)94-109
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Financial Stability
Volume40
Early online date4 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Fiscal policy
Tax
Financial frictions
Labor income
Funding
Spillover effects
Income tax
Public spending
Consumption tax
Household
Fiscal
Capital adequacy
Government
Labor tax
Robustness
Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model

Keywords

  • Banks
  • Financial frictions
  • Optimal fiscal policy
  • Policy reforms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Fiscal policy with banks and financial frictions. / Asimakopoulos, Panagiotis; Asimakopoulos, Stylianos.

In: Journal of Financial Stability, Vol. 40, 01.02.2019, p. 94-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{999984ac87694186917add6030f78f9f,
title = "Fiscal policy with banks and financial frictions",
abstract = "We assess the role of banks to the transmission of optimal and exogenous changes in fiscal policy to the economy. We built-up a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with patient and impatient agents, banks and a government to find that banks and their associated capital-adequacy constraint mitigate the negative spill-over effects to the economy from higher taxes. Specifically, we confirm that labour income tax is the most distortionary fiscal instrument. The optimal choice of a housing tax is the most favorable funding source to a temporary increase in public spending. The combination of housing and labour taxes is the most preferred tax bundle to be optimally chosen under negative output shocks. Moreover, a permanent increase in housing tax is beneficial if it is welfare enhancing and the existence of banks benefits mainly impatient households under permanently higher consumption taxes. Finally, these results remain robust to various robustness checks.",
keywords = "Banks, Financial frictions, Optimal fiscal policy, Policy reforms",
author = "Panagiotis Asimakopoulos and Stylianos Asimakopoulos",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jfs.2017.10.010",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "94--109",
journal = "Journal of Financial Stability",
issn = "1572-3089",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fiscal policy with banks and financial frictions

AU - Asimakopoulos, Panagiotis

AU - Asimakopoulos, Stylianos

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - We assess the role of banks to the transmission of optimal and exogenous changes in fiscal policy to the economy. We built-up a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with patient and impatient agents, banks and a government to find that banks and their associated capital-adequacy constraint mitigate the negative spill-over effects to the economy from higher taxes. Specifically, we confirm that labour income tax is the most distortionary fiscal instrument. The optimal choice of a housing tax is the most favorable funding source to a temporary increase in public spending. The combination of housing and labour taxes is the most preferred tax bundle to be optimally chosen under negative output shocks. Moreover, a permanent increase in housing tax is beneficial if it is welfare enhancing and the existence of banks benefits mainly impatient households under permanently higher consumption taxes. Finally, these results remain robust to various robustness checks.

AB - We assess the role of banks to the transmission of optimal and exogenous changes in fiscal policy to the economy. We built-up a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with patient and impatient agents, banks and a government to find that banks and their associated capital-adequacy constraint mitigate the negative spill-over effects to the economy from higher taxes. Specifically, we confirm that labour income tax is the most distortionary fiscal instrument. The optimal choice of a housing tax is the most favorable funding source to a temporary increase in public spending. The combination of housing and labour taxes is the most preferred tax bundle to be optimally chosen under negative output shocks. Moreover, a permanent increase in housing tax is beneficial if it is welfare enhancing and the existence of banks benefits mainly impatient households under permanently higher consumption taxes. Finally, these results remain robust to various robustness checks.

KW - Banks

KW - Financial frictions

KW - Optimal fiscal policy

KW - Policy reforms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032919822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jfs.2017.10.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jfs.2017.10.010

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 94

EP - 109

JO - Journal of Financial Stability

JF - Journal of Financial Stability

SN - 1572-3089

ER -