First do no harm

do air raids protect civilians?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A recent revelation by President and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Martti Ahtisaari suggests that the large scale destruction of Syria could perhaps have been avoided by diplomacy. However, the negotiated solution was not accepted by all permanent members of the UN Security Council.
This view article reconstructs the Kaldorian, constructivist, cosmopolitan argument that was opposed to Ahtisaari's suggestion to negotiate and offer a face saving to President Assad. According to this argument, negotiation with Assad as a practice would have constituted a reality in which some of the basic norms against crimes against humanity did not exist, while only enforcement of such norms could have constituted a reality conducive for cosmopolitan progress. However, this article will show why such an argument was unrealistic and mpractical. It will conclude that the bi powers should have started negotiations on the platform of President Ahtisaari's formula.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-64
Number of pages10
JournalMiddle East Policy
Volume22
Issue number4
Early online date1 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

president
air
UN Security Council
Syria
diplomacy
peace
offense

Keywords

  • Cosmopolitanism
  • intervention
  • humanitarian law
  • human rights
  • Syria

Cite this

First do no harm : do air raids protect civilians? / Kivimaki, Timo.

In: Middle East Policy, Vol. 22, No. 4, 01.12.2015, p. 55-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{07bc73bbaeda4bfba2bc9c55aff94f6a,
title = "First do no harm: do air raids protect civilians?",
abstract = "A recent revelation by President and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Martti Ahtisaari suggests that the large scale destruction of Syria could perhaps have been avoided by diplomacy. However, the negotiated solution was not accepted by all permanent members of the UN Security Council. This view article reconstructs the Kaldorian, constructivist, cosmopolitan argument that was opposed to Ahtisaari's suggestion to negotiate and offer a face saving to President Assad. According to this argument, negotiation with Assad as a practice would have constituted a reality in which some of the basic norms against crimes against humanity did not exist, while only enforcement of such norms could have constituted a reality conducive for cosmopolitan progress. However, this article will show why such an argument was unrealistic and mpractical. It will conclude that the bi powers should have started negotiations on the platform of President Ahtisaari's formula.",
keywords = "Cosmopolitanism, intervention, humanitarian law, human rights , Syria",
author = "Timo Kivimaki",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/mepo.12157",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "55--64",
journal = "Middle East Policy",
issn = "1061-1924",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - First do no harm

T2 - do air raids protect civilians?

AU - Kivimaki, Timo

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - A recent revelation by President and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Martti Ahtisaari suggests that the large scale destruction of Syria could perhaps have been avoided by diplomacy. However, the negotiated solution was not accepted by all permanent members of the UN Security Council. This view article reconstructs the Kaldorian, constructivist, cosmopolitan argument that was opposed to Ahtisaari's suggestion to negotiate and offer a face saving to President Assad. According to this argument, negotiation with Assad as a practice would have constituted a reality in which some of the basic norms against crimes against humanity did not exist, while only enforcement of such norms could have constituted a reality conducive for cosmopolitan progress. However, this article will show why such an argument was unrealistic and mpractical. It will conclude that the bi powers should have started negotiations on the platform of President Ahtisaari's formula.

AB - A recent revelation by President and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Martti Ahtisaari suggests that the large scale destruction of Syria could perhaps have been avoided by diplomacy. However, the negotiated solution was not accepted by all permanent members of the UN Security Council. This view article reconstructs the Kaldorian, constructivist, cosmopolitan argument that was opposed to Ahtisaari's suggestion to negotiate and offer a face saving to President Assad. According to this argument, negotiation with Assad as a practice would have constituted a reality in which some of the basic norms against crimes against humanity did not exist, while only enforcement of such norms could have constituted a reality conducive for cosmopolitan progress. However, this article will show why such an argument was unrealistic and mpractical. It will conclude that the bi powers should have started negotiations on the platform of President Ahtisaari's formula.

KW - Cosmopolitanism

KW - intervention

KW - humanitarian law

KW - human rights

KW - Syria

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12157

U2 - 10.1111/mepo.12157

DO - 10.1111/mepo.12157

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 55

EP - 64

JO - Middle East Policy

JF - Middle East Policy

SN - 1061-1924

IS - 4

ER -