TY - JOUR
T1 - Firms as the source of innovation and growth
T2 - The evolution of technological competence
AU - Fai, Felicia
AU - Cantwell, John
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - It is argued that the firm is the principal source of innovation and growth, a device for the establishment of technological competence, and for its continued development over time. Markets, products and background knowledge may change quite dramatically over time. Yet as a result of the cumulative nature of learning in the production processes of firms, the profile of corporate technological competence will tend to persist over quite long periods, provided there is institutional continuity. Within the same firm, competence may evolve into related areas, but the firm's technological origins will remain identifiable in its subsequent trajectories. However, if the institution itself changes more dramatically, this technological persistence may be disrupted. Supporting evidence is provided from data on the patenting of 30 large US and European companies, which have been continuously active since the interwar period. The science and the knowledge base, and the composition of products and markets may shift quite radically, but the firm's productive and technological system itself is potentially more stable. The firm provides a vehicle for potential institutional continuity and a device for managing transitions within the economic system.
AB - It is argued that the firm is the principal source of innovation and growth, a device for the establishment of technological competence, and for its continued development over time. Markets, products and background knowledge may change quite dramatically over time. Yet as a result of the cumulative nature of learning in the production processes of firms, the profile of corporate technological competence will tend to persist over quite long periods, provided there is institutional continuity. Within the same firm, competence may evolve into related areas, but the firm's technological origins will remain identifiable in its subsequent trajectories. However, if the institution itself changes more dramatically, this technological persistence may be disrupted. Supporting evidence is provided from data on the patenting of 30 large US and European companies, which have been continuously active since the interwar period. The science and the knowledge base, and the composition of products and markets may shift quite radically, but the firm's productive and technological system itself is potentially more stable. The firm provides a vehicle for potential institutional continuity and a device for managing transitions within the economic system.
KW - corporate technological competence
KW - technological persistence
KW - Firms
KW - Innovation
KW - Growth
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001910050086
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0033412096
U2 - 10.1007/s001910050086
DO - 10.1007/s001910050086
M3 - Article
SN - 0936-9937
VL - 9
SP - 331
EP - 366
JO - Journal of Evolutionary Economics
JF - Journal of Evolutionary Economics
IS - 3
ER -