Feasibility, reliability, and sensitivity to change of four radiographic scoring methods in patients with psoriatic arthritis

W Tillett, D Jadon, G Shaddick, G Robinson, R Sengupta, E Korendowych, C S de Vries, N J McHugh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)
161 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective We set out to assess the feasibility, reliability, and sensitivity to change of 4 radiographic scoring methods in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods Hand and feet radiographs from 50 patients with PsA were scored at 2 time points by 2 assessors with each of the following methods: modified Steinbrocker score, modified Sharp score (MSS), modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS), and the Ratingen score for PsA. The radiographs of 10 patients were scored by both assessors to assess reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Sensitivity to change was estimated using a standardized response mean (SRM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Results The patients' mean ± SD age at baseline was 50 ± 12.1 years, the mean ± SD disease duration was 10 ± 8.4 years, and the mean ± SD followup period was 25 ± 9.6 months. Intrarater reliability was excellent for all methods (ICC >0.97). Interrater reliability was highest for the SHS (ICC 0.95-0.99). The percentage SDC for the Steinbrocker method, the Ratingen method, the MSS, and the SHS was 2.9%, 2.1%, 1.4%, and 1.2%, respectively, and the SRMs were 0.46, 0.44, 0.77, and 0.79, respectively. The mean time to score each of the Steinbrocker method, the Ratingen method, the MSS, and the SHS was 6.2, 10.5, 14.6, and 14.4 minutes, respectively. Conclusion The SHS method was the most reliable and sensitive to change but took longer to perform. The Steinbrocker method is the most feasible but lacks the sensitivity of the SHS. The SDC of the Ratingen method is close to that of the SHS and MSS, but is quicker to perform.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)311-317
Number of pages7
JournalArthritis Care and Research
Volume66
Issue number2
Early online date7 Aug 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Psoriatic Arthritis
Research Design
Foot
Hand

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Arthritis, Psoriatic
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Foot Joints
  • Hand Joints
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Observer Variation
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Radiography
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Time Factors
  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Studies
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Cite this

Feasibility, reliability, and sensitivity to change of four radiographic scoring methods in patients with psoriatic arthritis. / Tillett, W; Jadon, D; Shaddick, G; Robinson, G; Sengupta, R; Korendowych, E; de Vries, C S; McHugh, N J.

In: Arthritis Care and Research, Vol. 66, No. 2, 02.2014, p. 311-317.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c4fca9256b884304afa129f64005db6f,
title = "Feasibility, reliability, and sensitivity to change of four radiographic scoring methods in patients with psoriatic arthritis",
abstract = "Objective We set out to assess the feasibility, reliability, and sensitivity to change of 4 radiographic scoring methods in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods Hand and feet radiographs from 50 patients with PsA were scored at 2 time points by 2 assessors with each of the following methods: modified Steinbrocker score, modified Sharp score (MSS), modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS), and the Ratingen score for PsA. The radiographs of 10 patients were scored by both assessors to assess reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Sensitivity to change was estimated using a standardized response mean (SRM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Results The patients' mean ± SD age at baseline was 50 ± 12.1 years, the mean ± SD disease duration was 10 ± 8.4 years, and the mean ± SD followup period was 25 ± 9.6 months. Intrarater reliability was excellent for all methods (ICC >0.97). Interrater reliability was highest for the SHS (ICC 0.95-0.99). The percentage SDC for the Steinbrocker method, the Ratingen method, the MSS, and the SHS was 2.9{\%}, 2.1{\%}, 1.4{\%}, and 1.2{\%}, respectively, and the SRMs were 0.46, 0.44, 0.77, and 0.79, respectively. The mean time to score each of the Steinbrocker method, the Ratingen method, the MSS, and the SHS was 6.2, 10.5, 14.6, and 14.4 minutes, respectively. Conclusion The SHS method was the most reliable and sensitive to change but took longer to perform. The Steinbrocker method is the most feasible but lacks the sensitivity of the SHS. The SDC of the Ratingen method is close to that of the SHS and MSS, but is quicker to perform.",
keywords = "Adult, Analysis of Variance, Arthritis, Psoriatic, Feasibility Studies, Foot Joints, Hand Joints, Humans, Middle Aged, Observer Variation, Predictive Value of Tests, Radiography, Reproducibility of Results, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Comparative Study, Evaluation Studies, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "W Tillett and D Jadon and G Shaddick and G Robinson and R Sengupta and E Korendowych and {de Vries}, {C S} and McHugh, {N J}",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2014 by the American College of Rheumatology.",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1002/acr.22104",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "311--317",
journal = "Arthritis Care and Research",
issn = "2151-464X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility, reliability, and sensitivity to change of four radiographic scoring methods in patients with psoriatic arthritis

AU - Tillett, W

AU - Jadon, D

AU - Shaddick, G

AU - Robinson, G

AU - Sengupta, R

AU - Korendowych, E

AU - de Vries, C S

AU - McHugh, N J

N1 - Copyright © 2014 by the American College of Rheumatology.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Objective We set out to assess the feasibility, reliability, and sensitivity to change of 4 radiographic scoring methods in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods Hand and feet radiographs from 50 patients with PsA were scored at 2 time points by 2 assessors with each of the following methods: modified Steinbrocker score, modified Sharp score (MSS), modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS), and the Ratingen score for PsA. The radiographs of 10 patients were scored by both assessors to assess reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Sensitivity to change was estimated using a standardized response mean (SRM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Results The patients' mean ± SD age at baseline was 50 ± 12.1 years, the mean ± SD disease duration was 10 ± 8.4 years, and the mean ± SD followup period was 25 ± 9.6 months. Intrarater reliability was excellent for all methods (ICC >0.97). Interrater reliability was highest for the SHS (ICC 0.95-0.99). The percentage SDC for the Steinbrocker method, the Ratingen method, the MSS, and the SHS was 2.9%, 2.1%, 1.4%, and 1.2%, respectively, and the SRMs were 0.46, 0.44, 0.77, and 0.79, respectively. The mean time to score each of the Steinbrocker method, the Ratingen method, the MSS, and the SHS was 6.2, 10.5, 14.6, and 14.4 minutes, respectively. Conclusion The SHS method was the most reliable and sensitive to change but took longer to perform. The Steinbrocker method is the most feasible but lacks the sensitivity of the SHS. The SDC of the Ratingen method is close to that of the SHS and MSS, but is quicker to perform.

AB - Objective We set out to assess the feasibility, reliability, and sensitivity to change of 4 radiographic scoring methods in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods Hand and feet radiographs from 50 patients with PsA were scored at 2 time points by 2 assessors with each of the following methods: modified Steinbrocker score, modified Sharp score (MSS), modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS), and the Ratingen score for PsA. The radiographs of 10 patients were scored by both assessors to assess reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Sensitivity to change was estimated using a standardized response mean (SRM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Results The patients' mean ± SD age at baseline was 50 ± 12.1 years, the mean ± SD disease duration was 10 ± 8.4 years, and the mean ± SD followup period was 25 ± 9.6 months. Intrarater reliability was excellent for all methods (ICC >0.97). Interrater reliability was highest for the SHS (ICC 0.95-0.99). The percentage SDC for the Steinbrocker method, the Ratingen method, the MSS, and the SHS was 2.9%, 2.1%, 1.4%, and 1.2%, respectively, and the SRMs were 0.46, 0.44, 0.77, and 0.79, respectively. The mean time to score each of the Steinbrocker method, the Ratingen method, the MSS, and the SHS was 6.2, 10.5, 14.6, and 14.4 minutes, respectively. Conclusion The SHS method was the most reliable and sensitive to change but took longer to perform. The Steinbrocker method is the most feasible but lacks the sensitivity of the SHS. The SDC of the Ratingen method is close to that of the SHS and MSS, but is quicker to perform.

KW - Adult

KW - Analysis of Variance

KW - Arthritis, Psoriatic

KW - Feasibility Studies

KW - Foot Joints

KW - Hand Joints

KW - Humans

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Observer Variation

KW - Predictive Value of Tests

KW - Radiography

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Severity of Illness Index

KW - Time Factors

KW - Comparative Study

KW - Evaluation Studies

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893366599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acr.22104

DO - 10.1002/acr.22104

M3 - Article

C2 - 23925955

AN - SCOPUS:84893366599

VL - 66

SP - 311

EP - 317

JO - Arthritis Care and Research

JF - Arthritis Care and Research

SN - 2151-464X

IS - 2

ER -