Fear and loathing in the Academy?: The role of emotion in response to an impact agenda in the UK and Australia

Jennifer Chubb, Richard Watermeyer, Paul Wakeling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

The research impact agenda is frequently portrayed through ‘crisis’ accounts whereby academic identity is at risk of a kind of existential unravelling. Amid reports of academics under siege in an environment in which self-sovereignty is traditionally preferred and regulation is resisted, heightened emotionalism, namely fear and dread dominate the discourse. Such accounts belie the complexity of the varying moral dispositions, experiences and attitudes possessed by different individuals and groups in the academic research community. In this article we attempt to examine the role of the affective in response to a particular research policy directive - the impact agenda. In doing so, we reveal the contributing factors affecting the community’s reaction to impact. In cases where personal, moral and disciplinary identities align with the impact agenda, the emotional response is positive and productive. For many academics however, misalignment gives rise to emotional dissonance. We argue that when harnessed, further acknowledgement of the role of emotion in the academy can produce a more socially and morally coherent response to an impact agenda. We review academic responses from the UK and Australia (n=51) and observe a community heavily emotionally invested in what they do, such that threats to academic identity and research are consequently threats to the self.
LanguageEnglish
Pages555-568
JournalHigher Education Research and Development
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

academy
emotion
anxiety
threat
impact research
community
research policy
disposition
sovereignty
regulation
discourse
experience
Group

Cite this

Fear and loathing in the Academy? : The role of emotion in response to an impact agenda in the UK and Australia. / Chubb, Jennifer; Watermeyer, Richard; Wakeling, Paul.

In: Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2017, p. 555-568.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1609c57207a34e78ac05f9ab673d0383,
title = "Fear and loathing in the Academy?: The role of emotion in response to an impact agenda in the UK and Australia",
abstract = "The research impact agenda is frequently portrayed through ‘crisis’ accounts whereby academic identity is at risk of a kind of existential unravelling. Amid reports of academics under siege in an environment in which self-sovereignty is traditionally preferred and regulation is resisted, heightened emotionalism, namely fear and dread dominate the discourse. Such accounts belie the complexity of the varying moral dispositions, experiences and attitudes possessed by different individuals and groups in the academic research community. In this article we attempt to examine the role of the affective in response to a particular research policy directive - the impact agenda. In doing so, we reveal the contributing factors affecting the community’s reaction to impact. In cases where personal, moral and disciplinary identities align with the impact agenda, the emotional response is positive and productive. For many academics however, misalignment gives rise to emotional dissonance. We argue that when harnessed, further acknowledgement of the role of emotion in the academy can produce a more socially and morally coherent response to an impact agenda. We review academic responses from the UK and Australia (n=51) and observe a community heavily emotionally invested in what they do, such that threats to academic identity and research are consequently threats to the self.",
author = "Jennifer Chubb and Richard Watermeyer and Paul Wakeling",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/07294360.2017.1288709",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "555--568",
journal = "Higher Education Research and Development",
issn = "0729-4360",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fear and loathing in the Academy?

T2 - Higher Education Research and Development

AU - Chubb,Jennifer

AU - Watermeyer,Richard

AU - Wakeling,Paul

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The research impact agenda is frequently portrayed through ‘crisis’ accounts whereby academic identity is at risk of a kind of existential unravelling. Amid reports of academics under siege in an environment in which self-sovereignty is traditionally preferred and regulation is resisted, heightened emotionalism, namely fear and dread dominate the discourse. Such accounts belie the complexity of the varying moral dispositions, experiences and attitudes possessed by different individuals and groups in the academic research community. In this article we attempt to examine the role of the affective in response to a particular research policy directive - the impact agenda. In doing so, we reveal the contributing factors affecting the community’s reaction to impact. In cases where personal, moral and disciplinary identities align with the impact agenda, the emotional response is positive and productive. For many academics however, misalignment gives rise to emotional dissonance. We argue that when harnessed, further acknowledgement of the role of emotion in the academy can produce a more socially and morally coherent response to an impact agenda. We review academic responses from the UK and Australia (n=51) and observe a community heavily emotionally invested in what they do, such that threats to academic identity and research are consequently threats to the self.

AB - The research impact agenda is frequently portrayed through ‘crisis’ accounts whereby academic identity is at risk of a kind of existential unravelling. Amid reports of academics under siege in an environment in which self-sovereignty is traditionally preferred and regulation is resisted, heightened emotionalism, namely fear and dread dominate the discourse. Such accounts belie the complexity of the varying moral dispositions, experiences and attitudes possessed by different individuals and groups in the academic research community. In this article we attempt to examine the role of the affective in response to a particular research policy directive - the impact agenda. In doing so, we reveal the contributing factors affecting the community’s reaction to impact. In cases where personal, moral and disciplinary identities align with the impact agenda, the emotional response is positive and productive. For many academics however, misalignment gives rise to emotional dissonance. We argue that when harnessed, further acknowledgement of the role of emotion in the academy can produce a more socially and morally coherent response to an impact agenda. We review academic responses from the UK and Australia (n=51) and observe a community heavily emotionally invested in what they do, such that threats to academic identity and research are consequently threats to the self.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1288709

U2 - 10.1080/07294360.2017.1288709

DO - 10.1080/07294360.2017.1288709

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 555

EP - 568

JO - Higher Education Research and Development

JF - Higher Education Research and Development

SN - 0729-4360

IS - 3

ER -