Fathers and work-life balance in France and the UK

Policy and practice

Abigail Gregory, Susan Milner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)
88 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose – This paper focuses on the role of organizations in mediating the impact of national work-life balance (WLB) policy on employees, in particular fathers.
Design/methodology/approach – It presents existing research about WLB policy implementation in organizations as well as the findings of empirical work in insurance and social work in France and the UK (questionnaire survey, case study analysis, interviews with national and sector-level trade union officials).
Findings – These indicate that fathers’ take-up of WLB policies is the outcome of a complex dynamic between national fatherhood regimes, organizational and sector characteristics and the individual employee. They suggest that fathers tend to use WLB measures to spend time with their families where measures increase their sense of entitlement (state policies of paternity leave) or where measures offer non-gendered flexibility (reduced working time/organizational systems of flexi-time). In line with other studies it also finds that fathers extensively use informal flexibility where this is available (individual agency).
Practical implications - These findings have implications for way WLB policies are framed at national and organizational level. At national level they indicate that policies work best when they give fathers a sense of entitlement, by giving specific rights linked to fatherhood (e.g. paternity leave or “daddy month”-type arrangements), and or by providing universal rights (e.g. to reduced working time and/or flexible working time); however where measures are linked to childcare they are often framed as mothers’ rights when translated to the organizational level. The research also shows that informal flexibility is used and valued by fathers within organizations, but that such informal arrangements are highly subject to local variation and intermediation by line managers and co-workers; hence, for effective and even coverage they would need to be backed up by formal rights.
Originality/value - Cross-national comparative research into WLB policy and practice at national and organizational level is very rare. The empirical work presented in this article, although exploratory, makes a significant contribution to our understanding of WLB policy and practice, particularly as it relates to fathers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-52
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
Volume31
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2011

Fingerprint

work-life-balance
father
France
fatherhood
sense of entitlement
employee
co-worker
comparative research
trade union
Work-life balance
social work
flexibility
coverage
time
regime
questionnaire
methodology
interview

Cite this

Fathers and work-life balance in France and the UK : Policy and practice. / Gregory, Abigail; Milner, Susan.

In: International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 31, No. 1-2, 02.2011, p. 34-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{99f17652adc04874b521a29fdfa9b17e,
title = "Fathers and work-life balance in France and the UK: Policy and practice",
abstract = "Purpose – This paper focuses on the role of organizations in mediating the impact of national work-life balance (WLB) policy on employees, in particular fathers. Design/methodology/approach – It presents existing research about WLB policy implementation in organizations as well as the findings of empirical work in insurance and social work in France and the UK (questionnaire survey, case study analysis, interviews with national and sector-level trade union officials). Findings – These indicate that fathers’ take-up of WLB policies is the outcome of a complex dynamic between national fatherhood regimes, organizational and sector characteristics and the individual employee. They suggest that fathers tend to use WLB measures to spend time with their families where measures increase their sense of entitlement (state policies of paternity leave) or where measures offer non-gendered flexibility (reduced working time/organizational systems of flexi-time). In line with other studies it also finds that fathers extensively use informal flexibility where this is available (individual agency). Practical implications - These findings have implications for way WLB policies are framed at national and organizational level. At national level they indicate that policies work best when they give fathers a sense of entitlement, by giving specific rights linked to fatherhood (e.g. paternity leave or “daddy month”-type arrangements), and or by providing universal rights (e.g. to reduced working time and/or flexible working time); however where measures are linked to childcare they are often framed as mothers’ rights when translated to the organizational level. The research also shows that informal flexibility is used and valued by fathers within organizations, but that such informal arrangements are highly subject to local variation and intermediation by line managers and co-workers; hence, for effective and even coverage they would need to be backed up by formal rights. Originality/value - Cross-national comparative research into WLB policy and practice at national and organizational level is very rare. The empirical work presented in this article, although exploratory, makes a significant contribution to our understanding of WLB policy and practice, particularly as it relates to fathers.",
author = "Abigail Gregory and Susan Milner",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1108/01443331111104797",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "34--52",
journal = "International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy",
issn = "0144-333X",
publisher = "Barmarick Publications",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fathers and work-life balance in France and the UK

T2 - Policy and practice

AU - Gregory, Abigail

AU - Milner, Susan

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Purpose – This paper focuses on the role of organizations in mediating the impact of national work-life balance (WLB) policy on employees, in particular fathers. Design/methodology/approach – It presents existing research about WLB policy implementation in organizations as well as the findings of empirical work in insurance and social work in France and the UK (questionnaire survey, case study analysis, interviews with national and sector-level trade union officials). Findings – These indicate that fathers’ take-up of WLB policies is the outcome of a complex dynamic between national fatherhood regimes, organizational and sector characteristics and the individual employee. They suggest that fathers tend to use WLB measures to spend time with their families where measures increase their sense of entitlement (state policies of paternity leave) or where measures offer non-gendered flexibility (reduced working time/organizational systems of flexi-time). In line with other studies it also finds that fathers extensively use informal flexibility where this is available (individual agency). Practical implications - These findings have implications for way WLB policies are framed at national and organizational level. At national level they indicate that policies work best when they give fathers a sense of entitlement, by giving specific rights linked to fatherhood (e.g. paternity leave or “daddy month”-type arrangements), and or by providing universal rights (e.g. to reduced working time and/or flexible working time); however where measures are linked to childcare they are often framed as mothers’ rights when translated to the organizational level. The research also shows that informal flexibility is used and valued by fathers within organizations, but that such informal arrangements are highly subject to local variation and intermediation by line managers and co-workers; hence, for effective and even coverage they would need to be backed up by formal rights. Originality/value - Cross-national comparative research into WLB policy and practice at national and organizational level is very rare. The empirical work presented in this article, although exploratory, makes a significant contribution to our understanding of WLB policy and practice, particularly as it relates to fathers.

AB - Purpose – This paper focuses on the role of organizations in mediating the impact of national work-life balance (WLB) policy on employees, in particular fathers. Design/methodology/approach – It presents existing research about WLB policy implementation in organizations as well as the findings of empirical work in insurance and social work in France and the UK (questionnaire survey, case study analysis, interviews with national and sector-level trade union officials). Findings – These indicate that fathers’ take-up of WLB policies is the outcome of a complex dynamic between national fatherhood regimes, organizational and sector characteristics and the individual employee. They suggest that fathers tend to use WLB measures to spend time with their families where measures increase their sense of entitlement (state policies of paternity leave) or where measures offer non-gendered flexibility (reduced working time/organizational systems of flexi-time). In line with other studies it also finds that fathers extensively use informal flexibility where this is available (individual agency). Practical implications - These findings have implications for way WLB policies are framed at national and organizational level. At national level they indicate that policies work best when they give fathers a sense of entitlement, by giving specific rights linked to fatherhood (e.g. paternity leave or “daddy month”-type arrangements), and or by providing universal rights (e.g. to reduced working time and/or flexible working time); however where measures are linked to childcare they are often framed as mothers’ rights when translated to the organizational level. The research also shows that informal flexibility is used and valued by fathers within organizations, but that such informal arrangements are highly subject to local variation and intermediation by line managers and co-workers; hence, for effective and even coverage they would need to be backed up by formal rights. Originality/value - Cross-national comparative research into WLB policy and practice at national and organizational level is very rare. The empirical work presented in this article, although exploratory, makes a significant contribution to our understanding of WLB policy and practice, particularly as it relates to fathers.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443331111104797

U2 - 10.1108/01443331111104797

DO - 10.1108/01443331111104797

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 34

EP - 52

JO - International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

JF - International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

SN - 0144-333X

IS - 1-2

ER -