Fair rules: Rethinking fairness

Nick Pearce

doi:10.1111/j.1744-540X.2007.00458.x

Fair rules: Rethinking fairness

Nick Pearce

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

13 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Nick Pearce takes issue with the almost exclusive focus on outcomes over processes in public service reform, and argues that the literature on procedural fairness provides important insights into human behaviour and attitudes that merit deeper attention in public service reform debates.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	11-22
Number of pages	12
Journal	Public Policy Research
Volume	14
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-540X.2007.00458.x
Publication status	Published - 1 Mar 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Public Administration
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1744-540X.2007.00458.x

Cite this

@article{1499a133f92d44feaa4a8a2f71f6bbc7,

title = "Fair rules: Rethinking fairness",

abstract = "Nick Pearce takes issue with the almost exclusive focus on outcomes over processes in public service reform, and argues that the literature on procedural fairness provides important insights into human behaviour and attitudes that merit deeper attention in public service reform debates.",

author = "Nick Pearce",

year = "2007",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/j.1744-540X.2007.00458.x",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "11--22",

journal = "Public Policy Research",

issn = "1744-5396",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fair rules

T2 - Rethinking fairness

AU - Pearce, Nick

PY - 2007/3/1

Y1 - 2007/3/1

N2 - Nick Pearce takes issue with the almost exclusive focus on outcomes over processes in public service reform, and argues that the literature on procedural fairness provides important insights into human behaviour and attitudes that merit deeper attention in public service reform debates.

AB - Nick Pearce takes issue with the almost exclusive focus on outcomes over processes in public service reform, and argues that the literature on procedural fairness provides important insights into human behaviour and attitudes that merit deeper attention in public service reform debates.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33947430450

U2 - 10.1111/j.1744-540X.2007.00458.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1744-540X.2007.00458.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33947430450

SN - 1744-5396

VL - 14

SP - 11

EP - 22

JO - Public Policy Research

JF - Public Policy Research

IS - 1

ER -

Fair rules: Rethinking fairness

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this