1 Citation (Scopus)
99 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recently, there has been automotive-industry-wide impetus to reduce the overall diesel vehicle emissions and the fuel consumption by increasing the fuel injection pressure within common-rail systems. Many production fuel injection systems are now capable of delivering rail pressures of 1800–2000 bar, with those able to achieve 3000 bar under development. In addition, there has been a gradual increase in the permitted fatty acid methyl ester content in EN 590 diesel from 5% to 7% with further increases to 10% proposed. With these changes, there has been mounting speculation that increasing the injection pressure, particularly with an elevated biodiesel content, can contribute to fuel degradation, deposit formation, fuel filter blocking and corresponding vehicle reliability issues. In this investigation, a bespoke high-pressure fuel injection rig was designed and commissioned to mimic conditions representative of those experienced within a modern vehicle engine. The impacts of the rail pressure, the biodiesel content and the accelerated testing conditions on the stability of the diesel fuel and deposit formation leading to filter blocking were assessed. Despite the abundance of literature on laboratory-based biodiesel degradation, in these more realistic operating conditions it was found that biodiesel did not increase the likelihood of deposit formation within the high-pressure fuel system, with the same level of filter blocking observed for both the baseline diesel B0 (i.e. no biodiesel) and the B10 blend (which contains 10% biodiesel). This implies that the filter-blocking problem caused by onboard fuel degradation has the potential to occur broadly in a wide range of different fuel compositions. B10 fuel tested with a rail pressure of 2000 bar resulted in a pressure drop across the fuel filter of 0.5 bar within 12,000 min (approximately 8.3 days), whereas the corresponding experiment at a rail pressure of 1000 bar showed no increase in the filter pressure. When using model (B10) fuel, filter blocking was observed at rail pressures of both 2000 bar and 1000 bar, but with a lower pressure at a much reduced rate, leading to the belief that the increases in the rail pressure towards 2000 bar has a significant effect on the propensity of vehicle diesel filters to block. Measures taken to increase the severity of the test, such as recirculating injected fuel to simulate shear effects, were found to increase the rate of degradation but did not change the chemical composition of the solids formed, thus implying that they were valid methods of reducing the test duration without introducing new degradation mechanisms. The rig presented here is therefore a suitable accelerated testing system for assessing the behaviour of fuels at higher pressures that will be common throughout the global diesel fleet in the near future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106-117
Number of pages12
JournalProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering
Volume232
Issue number1
Early online date20 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Fuel systems
Diesel fuels
Degradation
Rails
Fuel filters
Biofuels
Biodiesel
Fuel injection
Deposits
Vehicle Emissions
Testing
Chemical analysis
Mountings
Automotive industry
Fuel consumption
Pressure drop

Keywords

  • Diesel fuel injection
  • diesel engine engineering
  • fuels for engines
  • performance of engines
  • fuel technology for engines
  • vehicle engines
  • engines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous)
  • Fuel Technology
  • Automotive Engineering

Cite this

@article{b4dd130bf6af4e43aba0aad1ccc17926,
title = "Factors affecting diesel fuel degradation using a bespoke high-pressure fuel system rig",
abstract = "Recently, there has been automotive-industry-wide impetus to reduce the overall diesel vehicle emissions and the fuel consumption by increasing the fuel injection pressure within common-rail systems. Many production fuel injection systems are now capable of delivering rail pressures of 1800–2000 bar, with those able to achieve 3000 bar under development. In addition, there has been a gradual increase in the permitted fatty acid methyl ester content in EN 590 diesel from 5{\%} to 7{\%} with further increases to 10{\%} proposed. With these changes, there has been mounting speculation that increasing the injection pressure, particularly with an elevated biodiesel content, can contribute to fuel degradation, deposit formation, fuel filter blocking and corresponding vehicle reliability issues. In this investigation, a bespoke high-pressure fuel injection rig was designed and commissioned to mimic conditions representative of those experienced within a modern vehicle engine. The impacts of the rail pressure, the biodiesel content and the accelerated testing conditions on the stability of the diesel fuel and deposit formation leading to filter blocking were assessed. Despite the abundance of literature on laboratory-based biodiesel degradation, in these more realistic operating conditions it was found that biodiesel did not increase the likelihood of deposit formation within the high-pressure fuel system, with the same level of filter blocking observed for both the baseline diesel B0 (i.e. no biodiesel) and the B10 blend (which contains 10{\%} biodiesel). This implies that the filter-blocking problem caused by onboard fuel degradation has the potential to occur broadly in a wide range of different fuel compositions. B10 fuel tested with a rail pressure of 2000 bar resulted in a pressure drop across the fuel filter of 0.5 bar within 12,000 min (approximately 8.3 days), whereas the corresponding experiment at a rail pressure of 1000 bar showed no increase in the filter pressure. When using model (B10) fuel, filter blocking was observed at rail pressures of both 2000 bar and 1000 bar, but with a lower pressure at a much reduced rate, leading to the belief that the increases in the rail pressure towards 2000 bar has a significant effect on the propensity of vehicle diesel filters to block. Measures taken to increase the severity of the test, such as recirculating injected fuel to simulate shear effects, were found to increase the rate of degradation but did not change the chemical composition of the solids formed, thus implying that they were valid methods of reducing the test duration without introducing new degradation mechanisms. The rig presented here is therefore a suitable accelerated testing system for assessing the behaviour of fuels at higher pressures that will be common throughout the global diesel fleet in the near future.",
keywords = "Diesel fuel injection, diesel engine engineering, fuels for engines, performance of engines, fuel technology for engines, vehicle engines, engines",
author = "Kesavan Gopalan and Christopher Smith and Simon Pickering and Christopher Chuck and Christopher Bannister",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0954407017723796",
language = "English",
volume = "232",
pages = "106--117",
journal = "Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering",
issn = "0954-4070",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors affecting diesel fuel degradation using a bespoke high-pressure fuel system rig

AU - Gopalan, Kesavan

AU - Smith, Christopher

AU - Pickering, Simon

AU - Chuck, Christopher

AU - Bannister, Christopher

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Recently, there has been automotive-industry-wide impetus to reduce the overall diesel vehicle emissions and the fuel consumption by increasing the fuel injection pressure within common-rail systems. Many production fuel injection systems are now capable of delivering rail pressures of 1800–2000 bar, with those able to achieve 3000 bar under development. In addition, there has been a gradual increase in the permitted fatty acid methyl ester content in EN 590 diesel from 5% to 7% with further increases to 10% proposed. With these changes, there has been mounting speculation that increasing the injection pressure, particularly with an elevated biodiesel content, can contribute to fuel degradation, deposit formation, fuel filter blocking and corresponding vehicle reliability issues. In this investigation, a bespoke high-pressure fuel injection rig was designed and commissioned to mimic conditions representative of those experienced within a modern vehicle engine. The impacts of the rail pressure, the biodiesel content and the accelerated testing conditions on the stability of the diesel fuel and deposit formation leading to filter blocking were assessed. Despite the abundance of literature on laboratory-based biodiesel degradation, in these more realistic operating conditions it was found that biodiesel did not increase the likelihood of deposit formation within the high-pressure fuel system, with the same level of filter blocking observed for both the baseline diesel B0 (i.e. no biodiesel) and the B10 blend (which contains 10% biodiesel). This implies that the filter-blocking problem caused by onboard fuel degradation has the potential to occur broadly in a wide range of different fuel compositions. B10 fuel tested with a rail pressure of 2000 bar resulted in a pressure drop across the fuel filter of 0.5 bar within 12,000 min (approximately 8.3 days), whereas the corresponding experiment at a rail pressure of 1000 bar showed no increase in the filter pressure. When using model (B10) fuel, filter blocking was observed at rail pressures of both 2000 bar and 1000 bar, but with a lower pressure at a much reduced rate, leading to the belief that the increases in the rail pressure towards 2000 bar has a significant effect on the propensity of vehicle diesel filters to block. Measures taken to increase the severity of the test, such as recirculating injected fuel to simulate shear effects, were found to increase the rate of degradation but did not change the chemical composition of the solids formed, thus implying that they were valid methods of reducing the test duration without introducing new degradation mechanisms. The rig presented here is therefore a suitable accelerated testing system for assessing the behaviour of fuels at higher pressures that will be common throughout the global diesel fleet in the near future.

AB - Recently, there has been automotive-industry-wide impetus to reduce the overall diesel vehicle emissions and the fuel consumption by increasing the fuel injection pressure within common-rail systems. Many production fuel injection systems are now capable of delivering rail pressures of 1800–2000 bar, with those able to achieve 3000 bar under development. In addition, there has been a gradual increase in the permitted fatty acid methyl ester content in EN 590 diesel from 5% to 7% with further increases to 10% proposed. With these changes, there has been mounting speculation that increasing the injection pressure, particularly with an elevated biodiesel content, can contribute to fuel degradation, deposit formation, fuel filter blocking and corresponding vehicle reliability issues. In this investigation, a bespoke high-pressure fuel injection rig was designed and commissioned to mimic conditions representative of those experienced within a modern vehicle engine. The impacts of the rail pressure, the biodiesel content and the accelerated testing conditions on the stability of the diesel fuel and deposit formation leading to filter blocking were assessed. Despite the abundance of literature on laboratory-based biodiesel degradation, in these more realistic operating conditions it was found that biodiesel did not increase the likelihood of deposit formation within the high-pressure fuel system, with the same level of filter blocking observed for both the baseline diesel B0 (i.e. no biodiesel) and the B10 blend (which contains 10% biodiesel). This implies that the filter-blocking problem caused by onboard fuel degradation has the potential to occur broadly in a wide range of different fuel compositions. B10 fuel tested with a rail pressure of 2000 bar resulted in a pressure drop across the fuel filter of 0.5 bar within 12,000 min (approximately 8.3 days), whereas the corresponding experiment at a rail pressure of 1000 bar showed no increase in the filter pressure. When using model (B10) fuel, filter blocking was observed at rail pressures of both 2000 bar and 1000 bar, but with a lower pressure at a much reduced rate, leading to the belief that the increases in the rail pressure towards 2000 bar has a significant effect on the propensity of vehicle diesel filters to block. Measures taken to increase the severity of the test, such as recirculating injected fuel to simulate shear effects, were found to increase the rate of degradation but did not change the chemical composition of the solids formed, thus implying that they were valid methods of reducing the test duration without introducing new degradation mechanisms. The rig presented here is therefore a suitable accelerated testing system for assessing the behaviour of fuels at higher pressures that will be common throughout the global diesel fleet in the near future.

KW - Diesel fuel injection

KW - diesel engine engineering

KW - fuels for engines

KW - performance of engines

KW - fuel technology for engines

KW - vehicle engines

KW - engines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040828001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0954407017723796

DO - 10.1177/0954407017723796

M3 - Article

VL - 232

SP - 106

EP - 117

JO - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering

JF - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering

SN - 0954-4070

IS - 1

ER -