Facial masculinity is related to perceived age but not perceived health

Lynda G. Boothroyd, Ben C. Jones, D. Michael Burt, R. Elisabeth Cornwell, Anthony C. Little, Bernard P. Tiddeman, David I. Perrett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Variation in women's preferences for male facial masculinity may reflect variation in attraction to immunocompetence or to maturity. This paper reports two studies on (a) the interrelationships between women's preferences for masculinity, apparent health, and age in male faces and (b) the extent to which manipulating each of these characteristics affects women's attributions of the remaining characteristics. Both studies were carried out with a large sample of the general public (Studies 1a and 2a) and independently in a laboratory environment with smaller undergraduate samples (Studies 1b and 2b). In both samples, masculinity and age preferences were positively related, and masculinity preferences were not associated with preferences for apparent health. There was also a positive relationship between perceived age and perceived masculinity in both samples, but evidence for a link between perceptions of masculinity and health was equivocal. Collectively, these findings suggest that variation in women's preferences for masculine proportions in male faces reflect variation in attraction to male age and do not support a strict immunocompetence explanation of preferences for facial masculinity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)417-431
Number of pages15
JournalEvolution and Human Behavior
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2005

Keywords

  • Dominance
  • Facial masculinity
  • Health
  • Immunocompetence
  • Neoteny
  • Status

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Development

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Facial masculinity is related to perceived age but not perceived health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this