Eye movements to audiovisual scenes reveal expectations of a just world

Mitchell J. Callan, Heather J. Ferguson, Markus Bindemann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When confronted with bad things happening to good people, observers often engage reactive strategies, such as victim derogation, to maintain a belief in a just world. Although such reasoning is usually made retrospectively, we investigated the extent to which knowledge of another person's good or bad behavior can also bias people's online expectations for subsequent good or bad outcomes. Using a fully crossed design, participants listened to auditory scenarios that varied in terms of whether the characters engaged in morally good or bad behavior while their eye movements were tracked around concurrent visual scenes depicting good and bad outcomes. We found that the good (bad) behavior of the characters influenced gaze preferences for good (bad) outcomes just prior to the actual outcomes being revealed. These findings suggest that beliefs about a person's moral worth encourage observers to foresee a preferred deserved outcome as the event unfolds. We include evidence to show that this effect cannot be explained in terms of affective priming or matching strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-40
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume142
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Eye Movements
Person
Observer

Keywords

  • Belief in a just world
  • Eye movements
  • Just-world schema
  • Moral behavior
  • Visual world paradigm

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

Eye movements to audiovisual scenes reveal expectations of a just world. / Callan, Mitchell J.; Ferguson, Heather J.; Bindemann, Markus.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 142, No. 1, 2013, p. 34-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Callan, Mitchell J. ; Ferguson, Heather J. ; Bindemann, Markus. / Eye movements to audiovisual scenes reveal expectations of a just world. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2013 ; Vol. 142, No. 1. pp. 34-40.
@article{8b41eda236f5489ebb53b0482c0bc1b3,
title = "Eye movements to audiovisual scenes reveal expectations of a just world",
abstract = "When confronted with bad things happening to good people, observers often engage reactive strategies, such as victim derogation, to maintain a belief in a just world. Although such reasoning is usually made retrospectively, we investigated the extent to which knowledge of another person's good or bad behavior can also bias people's online expectations for subsequent good or bad outcomes. Using a fully crossed design, participants listened to auditory scenarios that varied in terms of whether the characters engaged in morally good or bad behavior while their eye movements were tracked around concurrent visual scenes depicting good and bad outcomes. We found that the good (bad) behavior of the characters influenced gaze preferences for good (bad) outcomes just prior to the actual outcomes being revealed. These findings suggest that beliefs about a person's moral worth encourage observers to foresee a preferred deserved outcome as the event unfolds. We include evidence to show that this effect cannot be explained in terms of affective priming or matching strategies.",
keywords = "Belief in a just world, Eye movements, Just-world schema, Moral behavior, Visual world paradigm",
author = "Callan, {Mitchell J.} and Ferguson, {Heather J.} and Markus Bindemann",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1037/a0028261",
language = "English",
volume = "142",
pages = "34--40",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Eye movements to audiovisual scenes reveal expectations of a just world

AU - Callan, Mitchell J.

AU - Ferguson, Heather J.

AU - Bindemann, Markus

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - When confronted with bad things happening to good people, observers often engage reactive strategies, such as victim derogation, to maintain a belief in a just world. Although such reasoning is usually made retrospectively, we investigated the extent to which knowledge of another person's good or bad behavior can also bias people's online expectations for subsequent good or bad outcomes. Using a fully crossed design, participants listened to auditory scenarios that varied in terms of whether the characters engaged in morally good or bad behavior while their eye movements were tracked around concurrent visual scenes depicting good and bad outcomes. We found that the good (bad) behavior of the characters influenced gaze preferences for good (bad) outcomes just prior to the actual outcomes being revealed. These findings suggest that beliefs about a person's moral worth encourage observers to foresee a preferred deserved outcome as the event unfolds. We include evidence to show that this effect cannot be explained in terms of affective priming or matching strategies.

AB - When confronted with bad things happening to good people, observers often engage reactive strategies, such as victim derogation, to maintain a belief in a just world. Although such reasoning is usually made retrospectively, we investigated the extent to which knowledge of another person's good or bad behavior can also bias people's online expectations for subsequent good or bad outcomes. Using a fully crossed design, participants listened to auditory scenarios that varied in terms of whether the characters engaged in morally good or bad behavior while their eye movements were tracked around concurrent visual scenes depicting good and bad outcomes. We found that the good (bad) behavior of the characters influenced gaze preferences for good (bad) outcomes just prior to the actual outcomes being revealed. These findings suggest that beliefs about a person's moral worth encourage observers to foresee a preferred deserved outcome as the event unfolds. We include evidence to show that this effect cannot be explained in terms of affective priming or matching strategies.

KW - Belief in a just world

KW - Eye movements

KW - Just-world schema

KW - Moral behavior

KW - Visual world paradigm

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880963262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028261

U2 - 10.1037/a0028261

DO - 10.1037/a0028261

M3 - Article

VL - 142

SP - 34

EP - 40

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 1

ER -