Exploring why European primary care physicians sometimes do not think of, or act on, a possible cancer diagnosis. A qualitative study

Senada Hajdarevic, Cecilia Högberg, Mercè Marzo-Castillejo, Vija Silina, Jolanta Sawicka-Powierza, Magadalena Esteva, Tuomas Koskela, Davorina Petek, Sara Contreras-Martos, Marcello Mangione, Zlata Ožvačić Adžić, Radost Asenova, Svjetlana Gašparović Babić, Mette Brekke, Krzysztof Buczkowski, Nicola Buono, Saliha Serap Çifçili, Geert Jan Dinant, Babette Doorn, Robert D. HoffmanGeorge Kuodza, Peter Murchie, Liina Pilv, Aida Puia, Aurimas Rapalavicius, Emmanouil Smyrnakis, Birgitta Weltermann, Michael Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (SciVal)

Abstract

Background: While primary care physicians (PCPs) play a key role in cancer detection, they can find cancer diagnosis challenging, and some patients have considerable delays between presentation and onward referral. Aim: To explore European PCPs’ experiences and views on cases where they considered that they had been slow to think of, or act on, a possible cancer diagnosis. 

Design & setting: A multicentre European qualitative study, based on an online survey with open-ended questions, asking PCPs for their narratives about cases when they had missed a diagnosis of cancer. Method: Using maximum variation sampling, PCPs in 23 European countries were asked to describe what happened in a case where they were slow to think of a cancer diagnosis, and for their views on why it happened. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. 

Results: A total of 158 PCPs completed the questionnaire. The main themes were as follows: patients’ descriptions did not suggest cancer; distracting factors reduced PCPs’ cancer suspicions; patients’ hesitancy delayed the diagnosis; system factors not facilitating timely diagnosis; PCPs felt that they had acted wrongly; and problems with communicating adequately. 

Conclusion: The study identified six overarching themes that need to be addressed. Doing so should reduce morbidity and mortality in the small proportion of patients who have a significant, avoidable delay in their cancer diagnosis. The ‘Swiss cheese’ model of accident causation showed how the themes related to each other.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberBJGPO.2023.0029
JournalBJGP Open
Volume7
Issue number4
Early online date31 Dec 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2023

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the PCPs who piloted the questionnaire and those who complet-ed the survey. They would also like to thank the European GP Research Network for its support, and Marlene Lahti, Umeå University, Sweden, for producing the Swiss cheese graphic.

Funding

The Swedish application for ethical approval was funded by the Jämtland Cancer and Nursing Foundation. The study had no other external funding.

FundersFunder number
Jämtland Cancer and Nursing Foundation
Marlene Lahti, Umeå University

    Keywords

    • cancer
    • diagnostic errors
    • Europe
    • physicians
    • primary care
    • primary health care
    • qualitative research

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Family Practice

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring why European primary care physicians sometimes do not think of, or act on, a possible cancer diagnosis. A qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this