Exploring the attitudes of staff working within mental health settings toward clients who use cannabis

Ruth Clutterbuck, Derek Tobin, Jim Orford, Alex Copello, Mike Preece, Max Birchwood, Ed Day, Hermine Graham, Emma Griffith, Dermot McGovern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to explore the attitudes of staff working within mental health settings toward cannabis in general and cannabis use in individuals with severe mental-health problems. Method: Twenty members of staff working within community mental health teams in Birmingham, UK, were interviewed using qualitative research methods. The overarching themes within the staff accounts are described and the interrelationship between themes explored. Findings: Staff use an 'individualized' approach when working with cannabis-using clients dependent on a number of key components, including the positive and negative effects of use, wider evidence base, client vulnerability, engagement, professional and personal views and harm reduction. It is suggested that any approach staff may take toward cannabis use at any one time is greatly dependent upon the above factors and these factors are highly client specific. Conclusions: The findings may help to explain why interventions aimed at reducing substance use in people with psychosis might prove less successful when targeting cannabis use.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)311-327
Number of pages17
JournalDrugs: Education, Prevention and Policy
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the attitudes of staff working within mental health settings toward clients who use cannabis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Clutterbuck, R., Tobin, D., Orford, J., Copello, A., Preece, M., Birchwood, M., Day, E., Graham, H., Griffith, E., & McGovern, D. (2009). Exploring the attitudes of staff working within mental health settings toward clients who use cannabis. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 16(4), 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687630801945861