Abstract
Using data on 78 countries over 1980 to 2008 and a host of controls, this paper finds that switching from a floating regime to a pegged or an intermediate regime is likely to substantially reduce unemployment. Using a three-way regime classification, the estimated effect of switching to a pegged (to an intermediate) regime is around two percentage points (around one percentage point) after 2 years. These results are robust to variations in both specification and three-way classification. When using a four-way classification, we find evidence that switching from a float to a hard peg is most likely to reduce unemployment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 537-553 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Open Economies Review |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 12 Sept 2012 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS