Examining the utility of the Stages of Change model for working with offenders with learning disabilities

Holly Panting, Charlotte Swift, Wendy Goodman, Cara Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the Stages of Change (SOC) model can be applied to working with offenders with learning disabilities (LD), and furthermore, to determine if it might be efficacious for this approach to be incorporated into a wider service model for this population.

Design/methodology/approach
This paper reports on the results of a consultation to a specialist forensic LD service in the South West of England. A two-pronged approach was taken to consult to the service in relation to the research questions. First, a comprehensive literature review was undertaken, and second, other forensic LD teams and experts in the field were consulted.

Findings
There is a dearth of research that has examined the application of the SOC model to working with offenders with LD, and as such, firm conclusions cannot be drawn as to its efficacy in this population. The evidence base for the SOC model in itself is lacking, and has been widely critiqued. However, there are currently no other evidence-based models for understanding motivation to change in offenders with LD.

Research limitations/implications
There is a clear clinical need for more robust theory and research around motivation to change, which can then be applied to clinical work with offenders with LD.

Originality/value
There has been a historical narrative in offender rehabilitation that “nothing works” (Burrowes and Needs, 2009). As such, it is more important than ever for the evidence base to enhance the understanding of motivation to change in offending populations.
LanguageEnglish
Pages91-101
JournalJournal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatusPublished - 11 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Learning Disorders
Motivation
Research
Population
England
Referral and Consultation
Rehabilitation

Keywords

  • offenders, learning disabilities, stages of change, motivational interviewing

Cite this

Examining the utility of the Stages of Change model for working with offenders with learning disabilities. / Panting, Holly; Swift, Charlotte; Goodman, Wendy; Davis, Cara.

In: Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, Vol. 9, No. 2, 11.06.2018, p. 91-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{153aeab459d848d295259b083f23c889,
title = "Examining the utility of the Stages of Change model for working with offenders with learning disabilities",
abstract = "PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the Stages of Change (SOC) model can be applied to working with offenders with learning disabilities (LD), and furthermore, to determine if it might be efficacious for this approach to be incorporated into a wider service model for this population. Design/methodology/approachThis paper reports on the results of a consultation to a specialist forensic LD service in the South West of England. A two-pronged approach was taken to consult to the service in relation to the research questions. First, a comprehensive literature review was undertaken, and second, other forensic LD teams and experts in the field were consulted. FindingsThere is a dearth of research that has examined the application of the SOC model to working with offenders with LD, and as such, firm conclusions cannot be drawn as to its efficacy in this population. The evidence base for the SOC model in itself is lacking, and has been widely critiqued. However, there are currently no other evidence-based models for understanding motivation to change in offenders with LD. Research limitations/implicationsThere is a clear clinical need for more robust theory and research around motivation to change, which can then be applied to clinical work with offenders with LD. Originality/valueThere has been a historical narrative in offender rehabilitation that “nothing works” (Burrowes and Needs, 2009). As such, it is more important than ever for the evidence base to enhance the understanding of motivation to change in offending populations.",
keywords = "offenders, learning disabilities, stages of change, motivational interviewing",
author = "Holly Panting and Charlotte Swift and Wendy Goodman and Cara Davis",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1108/JIDOB-02-2018-0003",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "91--101",
journal = "Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour",
issn = "2050-8824",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the utility of the Stages of Change model for working with offenders with learning disabilities

AU - Panting, Holly

AU - Swift, Charlotte

AU - Goodman, Wendy

AU - Davis, Cara

PY - 2018/6/11

Y1 - 2018/6/11

N2 - PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the Stages of Change (SOC) model can be applied to working with offenders with learning disabilities (LD), and furthermore, to determine if it might be efficacious for this approach to be incorporated into a wider service model for this population. Design/methodology/approachThis paper reports on the results of a consultation to a specialist forensic LD service in the South West of England. A two-pronged approach was taken to consult to the service in relation to the research questions. First, a comprehensive literature review was undertaken, and second, other forensic LD teams and experts in the field were consulted. FindingsThere is a dearth of research that has examined the application of the SOC model to working with offenders with LD, and as such, firm conclusions cannot be drawn as to its efficacy in this population. The evidence base for the SOC model in itself is lacking, and has been widely critiqued. However, there are currently no other evidence-based models for understanding motivation to change in offenders with LD. Research limitations/implicationsThere is a clear clinical need for more robust theory and research around motivation to change, which can then be applied to clinical work with offenders with LD. Originality/valueThere has been a historical narrative in offender rehabilitation that “nothing works” (Burrowes and Needs, 2009). As such, it is more important than ever for the evidence base to enhance the understanding of motivation to change in offending populations.

AB - PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the Stages of Change (SOC) model can be applied to working with offenders with learning disabilities (LD), and furthermore, to determine if it might be efficacious for this approach to be incorporated into a wider service model for this population. Design/methodology/approachThis paper reports on the results of a consultation to a specialist forensic LD service in the South West of England. A two-pronged approach was taken to consult to the service in relation to the research questions. First, a comprehensive literature review was undertaken, and second, other forensic LD teams and experts in the field were consulted. FindingsThere is a dearth of research that has examined the application of the SOC model to working with offenders with LD, and as such, firm conclusions cannot be drawn as to its efficacy in this population. The evidence base for the SOC model in itself is lacking, and has been widely critiqued. However, there are currently no other evidence-based models for understanding motivation to change in offenders with LD. Research limitations/implicationsThere is a clear clinical need for more robust theory and research around motivation to change, which can then be applied to clinical work with offenders with LD. Originality/valueThere has been a historical narrative in offender rehabilitation that “nothing works” (Burrowes and Needs, 2009). As such, it is more important than ever for the evidence base to enhance the understanding of motivation to change in offending populations.

KW - offenders, learning disabilities, stages of change, motivational interviewing

U2 - 10.1108/JIDOB-02-2018-0003

DO - 10.1108/JIDOB-02-2018-0003

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 91

EP - 101

JO - Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour

T2 - Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour

JF - Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour

SN - 2050-8824

IS - 2

ER -