Exaggerating good governance

Regime type and score inflation among executive survey informants

Bethany Shockley, Michael Ewers, Yioryos Nardis, Justin Gengler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Researchers and policymakers often rely on executive surveys to understand and promote good governance. In doing so, they assume that the evaluations provided by these well-informed respondents are not systematically influenced by regime type. However, regime-embedded executives often have a personal stake in the survey outcomes, incentivizing them to exaggerate good governance. This paper compares World Economic Forum Executive Opinion Survey responses to corollary measures of key governance concepts in democracies, anocracies, and autocracies. It finds evidence of significant score inflation among executives in closed regimes. The individual-level mechanisms are explored in one autocracy by comparing responses from regime-embedded informants based at firms headquartered within the country with those managing businesses headquartered abroad. These micro-level data likewise reveal evidence of widespread inflation, particularly on items related to governance. Finally, a closer look at Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index demonstrates the broader impact Executive Opinion Survey inflation for measuring governance within closed regimes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)643-664
Number of pages22
JournalGovernance
Volume31
Issue number4
Early online date27 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

Exaggerating good governance : Regime type and score inflation among executive survey informants. / Shockley, Bethany; Ewers, Michael; Nardis, Yioryos; Gengler, Justin.

In: Governance, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.10.2018, p. 643-664.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shockley, Bethany ; Ewers, Michael ; Nardis, Yioryos ; Gengler, Justin. / Exaggerating good governance : Regime type and score inflation among executive survey informants. In: Governance. 2018 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 643-664.
@article{2893c41868044b74be5a035919641242,
title = "Exaggerating good governance: Regime type and score inflation among executive survey informants",
abstract = "Researchers and policymakers often rely on executive surveys to understand and promote good governance. In doing so, they assume that the evaluations provided by these well-informed respondents are not systematically influenced by regime type. However, regime-embedded executives often have a personal stake in the survey outcomes, incentivizing them to exaggerate good governance. This paper compares World Economic Forum Executive Opinion Survey responses to corollary measures of key governance concepts in democracies, anocracies, and autocracies. It finds evidence of significant score inflation among executives in closed regimes. The individual-level mechanisms are explored in one autocracy by comparing responses from regime-embedded informants based at firms headquartered within the country with those managing businesses headquartered abroad. These micro-level data likewise reveal evidence of widespread inflation, particularly on items related to governance. Finally, a closer look at Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index demonstrates the broader impact Executive Opinion Survey inflation for measuring governance within closed regimes.",
author = "Bethany Shockley and Michael Ewers and Yioryos Nardis and Justin Gengler",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/gove.12330",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "643--664",
journal = "Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions",
issn = "0952-1895",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exaggerating good governance

T2 - Regime type and score inflation among executive survey informants

AU - Shockley, Bethany

AU - Ewers, Michael

AU - Nardis, Yioryos

AU - Gengler, Justin

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Researchers and policymakers often rely on executive surveys to understand and promote good governance. In doing so, they assume that the evaluations provided by these well-informed respondents are not systematically influenced by regime type. However, regime-embedded executives often have a personal stake in the survey outcomes, incentivizing them to exaggerate good governance. This paper compares World Economic Forum Executive Opinion Survey responses to corollary measures of key governance concepts in democracies, anocracies, and autocracies. It finds evidence of significant score inflation among executives in closed regimes. The individual-level mechanisms are explored in one autocracy by comparing responses from regime-embedded informants based at firms headquartered within the country with those managing businesses headquartered abroad. These micro-level data likewise reveal evidence of widespread inflation, particularly on items related to governance. Finally, a closer look at Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index demonstrates the broader impact Executive Opinion Survey inflation for measuring governance within closed regimes.

AB - Researchers and policymakers often rely on executive surveys to understand and promote good governance. In doing so, they assume that the evaluations provided by these well-informed respondents are not systematically influenced by regime type. However, regime-embedded executives often have a personal stake in the survey outcomes, incentivizing them to exaggerate good governance. This paper compares World Economic Forum Executive Opinion Survey responses to corollary measures of key governance concepts in democracies, anocracies, and autocracies. It finds evidence of significant score inflation among executives in closed regimes. The individual-level mechanisms are explored in one autocracy by comparing responses from regime-embedded informants based at firms headquartered within the country with those managing businesses headquartered abroad. These micro-level data likewise reveal evidence of widespread inflation, particularly on items related to governance. Finally, a closer look at Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index demonstrates the broader impact Executive Opinion Survey inflation for measuring governance within closed regimes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039063646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/gove.12330

DO - 10.1111/gove.12330

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 643

EP - 664

JO - Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions

JF - Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions

SN - 0952-1895

IS - 4

ER -