Evolution of the genetic triplet code via two types of doublet codons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Explaining the apparent non-random codon distribution and the nature and number of amino acids in the ‘standard’ genetic code remains a challenge, despite the various hypotheses so far proposed. In this paper we propose a simple new hypothesis for code evolution involving a progression from singlet to doublet to triplet codons with a reading mechanism that moves three bases each step. We suggest that triplet codons gradually evolved from two types of ambiguous doublet codons, those in which the first two bases of each three-base window were read (‘prefix’ codons) and those in which the last two bases of each window were read (‘suffix’ codons). This hypothesis explains multiple features of the genetic code such as the origin of the pattern of four-fold degenerate and two-fold degenerate triplet codons, the origin of its error minimising properties, and why there are only 20 amino acids.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-64
JournalJournal of Molecular Evolution
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Genetic Code
genetic code
codons
Codon
amino acid
fold
Amino Acids
amino acids
code
Reading

Cite this

Evolution of the genetic triplet code via two types of doublet codons. / Wu, Huan-Lin; Bagby, Stefan; van den Elsen, Jean.

In: Journal of Molecular Evolution, Vol. 61, No. 1, 2005, p. 54-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0791475618ef49f48a8616b7f6d029dc,
title = "Evolution of the genetic triplet code via two types of doublet codons",
abstract = "Explaining the apparent non-random codon distribution and the nature and number of amino acids in the ‘standard’ genetic code remains a challenge, despite the various hypotheses so far proposed. In this paper we propose a simple new hypothesis for code evolution involving a progression from singlet to doublet to triplet codons with a reading mechanism that moves three bases each step. We suggest that triplet codons gradually evolved from two types of ambiguous doublet codons, those in which the first two bases of each three-base window were read (‘prefix’ codons) and those in which the last two bases of each window were read (‘suffix’ codons). This hypothesis explains multiple features of the genetic code such as the origin of the pattern of four-fold degenerate and two-fold degenerate triplet codons, the origin of its error minimising properties, and why there are only 20 amino acids.",
author = "Huan-Lin Wu and Stefan Bagby and {van den Elsen}, Jean",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1007/s00239-004-0224-3",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "54--64",
journal = "Journal of Molecular Evolution",
issn = "0022-2844",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolution of the genetic triplet code via two types of doublet codons

AU - Wu, Huan-Lin

AU - Bagby, Stefan

AU - van den Elsen, Jean

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Explaining the apparent non-random codon distribution and the nature and number of amino acids in the ‘standard’ genetic code remains a challenge, despite the various hypotheses so far proposed. In this paper we propose a simple new hypothesis for code evolution involving a progression from singlet to doublet to triplet codons with a reading mechanism that moves three bases each step. We suggest that triplet codons gradually evolved from two types of ambiguous doublet codons, those in which the first two bases of each three-base window were read (‘prefix’ codons) and those in which the last two bases of each window were read (‘suffix’ codons). This hypothesis explains multiple features of the genetic code such as the origin of the pattern of four-fold degenerate and two-fold degenerate triplet codons, the origin of its error minimising properties, and why there are only 20 amino acids.

AB - Explaining the apparent non-random codon distribution and the nature and number of amino acids in the ‘standard’ genetic code remains a challenge, despite the various hypotheses so far proposed. In this paper we propose a simple new hypothesis for code evolution involving a progression from singlet to doublet to triplet codons with a reading mechanism that moves three bases each step. We suggest that triplet codons gradually evolved from two types of ambiguous doublet codons, those in which the first two bases of each three-base window were read (‘prefix’ codons) and those in which the last two bases of each window were read (‘suffix’ codons). This hypothesis explains multiple features of the genetic code such as the origin of the pattern of four-fold degenerate and two-fold degenerate triplet codons, the origin of its error minimising properties, and why there are only 20 amino acids.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00239-004-0224-3

U2 - 10.1007/s00239-004-0224-3

DO - 10.1007/s00239-004-0224-3

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 54

EP - 64

JO - Journal of Molecular Evolution

JF - Journal of Molecular Evolution

SN - 0022-2844

IS - 1

ER -