Evidence on the Relationship between Firm-Based Screening and the Returns to Education

Sarah Brown, John G Sessions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We explore the relationship between the signalling role of education and direct screening measures adopted by employers using a matched employee-employer data set drawn from the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey for Great Britain. We identify which firms use personality/attitude and/or performance/competency tests during the hiring process and, by combining this and other firm level information with employee level characteristics, investigate whether such tests affect the signalling role of education. Our results suggest that hiring tests inhibit the signalling role of education, and that a failure to control for such tests may bias estimates of the returns to education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)498-509
Number of pages12
JournalEconomics of Education Review
Volume25
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

firm
employee
hiring
evidence
education
employer
personality
workplace
Returns to education
Screening
trend
performance
Education
Hiring
Employee relations
Matched employer-employee data
Employers
Competency
Work place
Employees

Keywords

  • Skills
  • Labor Productivity (J240)
  • Human Capital
  • Wage Differentials (J310)
  • Occupational Choice
  • Wage Level and Structure

Cite this

Evidence on the Relationship between Firm-Based Screening and the Returns to Education. / Brown, Sarah; Sessions, John G.

In: Economics of Education Review, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2006, p. 498-509.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brown, Sarah ; Sessions, John G. / Evidence on the Relationship between Firm-Based Screening and the Returns to Education. In: Economics of Education Review. 2006 ; Vol. 25, No. 5. pp. 498-509.
@article{2e7d411d312b40d7a7e6a3d24caae5ea,
title = "Evidence on the Relationship between Firm-Based Screening and the Returns to Education",
abstract = "We explore the relationship between the signalling role of education and direct screening measures adopted by employers using a matched employee-employer data set drawn from the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey for Great Britain. We identify which firms use personality/attitude and/or performance/competency tests during the hiring process and, by combining this and other firm level information with employee level characteristics, investigate whether such tests affect the signalling role of education. Our results suggest that hiring tests inhibit the signalling role of education, and that a failure to control for such tests may bias estimates of the returns to education.",
keywords = "Skills, Labor Productivity (J240), Human Capital, Wage Differentials (J310), Occupational Choice, Wage Level and Structure",
author = "Sarah Brown and Sessions, {John G}",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "498--509",
journal = "Economics of Education Review",
issn = "0272-7757",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence on the Relationship between Firm-Based Screening and the Returns to Education

AU - Brown, Sarah

AU - Sessions, John G

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - We explore the relationship between the signalling role of education and direct screening measures adopted by employers using a matched employee-employer data set drawn from the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey for Great Britain. We identify which firms use personality/attitude and/or performance/competency tests during the hiring process and, by combining this and other firm level information with employee level characteristics, investigate whether such tests affect the signalling role of education. Our results suggest that hiring tests inhibit the signalling role of education, and that a failure to control for such tests may bias estimates of the returns to education.

AB - We explore the relationship between the signalling role of education and direct screening measures adopted by employers using a matched employee-employer data set drawn from the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey for Great Britain. We identify which firms use personality/attitude and/or performance/competency tests during the hiring process and, by combining this and other firm level information with employee level characteristics, investigate whether such tests affect the signalling role of education. Our results suggest that hiring tests inhibit the signalling role of education, and that a failure to control for such tests may bias estimates of the returns to education.

KW - Skills

KW - Labor Productivity (J240)

KW - Human Capital

KW - Wage Differentials (J310)

KW - Occupational Choice

KW - Wage Level and Structure

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 498

EP - 509

JO - Economics of Education Review

JF - Economics of Education Review

SN - 0272-7757

IS - 5

ER -