TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence for common short natural trans sense-antisense pairing between transcripts from protein coding genes
AU - Wang, Ping
AU - Yin, Shanye
AU - Zhang, Zhenguo
AU - Xin, Dedong
AU - Hu, Landian
AU - Kong, Xiangyin
AU - Hurst, Laurence
PY - 2008/12/2
Y1 - 2008/12/2
N2 - Background: There is increasing realization that regulation of genes is done partly at the RNA
level by sense-antisense binding. Studies typically concentrate on the role of non-coding RNAs in
regulating coding RNA. But the majority of transcripts in a cell are likely to be coding. Is it possible
that coding RNA might regulate other coding RNA by short perfect sense-antisense binding? Here
we compare all well-described human protein coding mRNAs against all others to identify sites 15-
25 bp long that could potentially perfectly match sense-antisense.
Results: From 24,968 protein coding mRNA RefSeq sequences, none failed to find at least one
match in the transcriptome. By randomizations generating artificial transcripts matched for G+C
content and length, we found that there are more such trans short sense-antisense pairs than
expected. Several further features are consistent with functionality of some of the putative
matches. First, transcripts with more potential partners have lower expression levels, and the pair
density of tissue specific genes is significantly higher than that of housekeeping genes. Further, the
single nucleotide polymorphism density is lower in short pairing regions than it is in flanking regions.
We found no evidence that the sense-antisense pairing regions are associated with small RNAs
derived from the protein coding genes.
Conclusions: Our results are consistent with the possibility of common short perfect senseantisense
pairing between transcripts of protein coding genes.
AB - Background: There is increasing realization that regulation of genes is done partly at the RNA
level by sense-antisense binding. Studies typically concentrate on the role of non-coding RNAs in
regulating coding RNA. But the majority of transcripts in a cell are likely to be coding. Is it possible
that coding RNA might regulate other coding RNA by short perfect sense-antisense binding? Here
we compare all well-described human protein coding mRNAs against all others to identify sites 15-
25 bp long that could potentially perfectly match sense-antisense.
Results: From 24,968 protein coding mRNA RefSeq sequences, none failed to find at least one
match in the transcriptome. By randomizations generating artificial transcripts matched for G+C
content and length, we found that there are more such trans short sense-antisense pairs than
expected. Several further features are consistent with functionality of some of the putative
matches. First, transcripts with more potential partners have lower expression levels, and the pair
density of tissue specific genes is significantly higher than that of housekeeping genes. Further, the
single nucleotide polymorphism density is lower in short pairing regions than it is in flanking regions.
We found no evidence that the sense-antisense pairing regions are associated with small RNAs
derived from the protein coding genes.
Conclusions: Our results are consistent with the possibility of common short perfect senseantisense
pairing between transcripts of protein coding genes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57849138429&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-12-r169
U2 - 10.1186/gb-2008-9-12-r169
DO - 10.1186/gb-2008-9-12-r169
M3 - Article
SN - 1465-6906
VL - 9
SP - R169
JO - Genome Biology
JF - Genome Biology
IS - 12
ER -