Evaluation of NHS Injectable Medicines Guide users’ information needs related to the co-infusion of intravenous medicines: user survey and Delphi consensus study

Virginia Aguado Lorenzo, Matthew D. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives To explore intravenous drug compatibility information needs of National Health Service (NHS) Injectable Medicines Guide ('Medusa') users. To develop consensus expert recommendations on the intravenous drug compatibility information that Medusa should include. Design A convergent parallel design. An online survey of Medusa users. A three-round Delphi project developed expert consensus. Setting Community, secondary, tertiary and mental healthcare sites across the UK. Participants 142 Medusa users completed the online survey (114 nurses, 28 pharmacists). A panel of 16 nurses and 25 pharmacists currently practising in the NHS with professional expertise relevant to the compatibility of injectable medicines participated in the Delphi project. Primary and secondary outcome measures Users' ratings of the importance of different types of compatibility information. Consensus expert agreement on a six-point scale regarding the compatibility information that should be provided by Medusa. Results 97 (68%, 95% CI 60 to 75%) users were involved in the co-infusion of drugs at least weekly. Most users reported co-infusing intravenous fluids (n=116, 82%, 95% CI 75 to 87%), antibiotics (n=85, 60%, 95% CI 52 to 68%) and analgesics (n=81, 57%, 95% CI 49 to 65%) in the past year. They considered information on whether drugs are compatible/incompatible, and the concentrations and diluents in which this occurs, most important (Friedman test p<0.001, Dunn-Bonferroni pairwise comparisons p≤0.028). The expert panel also identified these topics as important for all infused drugs, along with information on time frames, supporting data and specific requirements for the intravenous line (median agreement rating of both professions ≥5 with IQR ≤1.75 in each case). Conclusion The co-infusion of drugs is common, so supporting information continues to be important. The most relevant information is that identified by both users and the expert panel: whether drugs are compatible/incompatible, and the concentrations and diluents in which this occurs. The expert panel's recommendation to provide information for all infused drugs contrasts with current more limited national recommendations.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere094211
JournalBMJ Open
Volume15
Issue number5
Early online date30 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 May 2025

Data Availability Statement

No data are available. Not applicable.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the expert advice and assistance provided by members of the Medusa editorial team or Advisory Board, and Professor Bryony Dean Franklin. We are also grateful for the time and thought contributed by all the participants.

Funding

This work was supported by the University of Bath [project number GA- PA0402], which had no role in the design, implementation or analysis.

FundersFunder number
University of BathGA-PA0402

    Keywords

    • Delphi Technique
    • Drug Combinations
    • Information management
    • Nursing Care
    • Pharmacists

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of NHS Injectable Medicines Guide users’ information needs related to the co-infusion of intravenous medicines: user survey and Delphi consensus study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this