Evaluating the impact of a time orientation intervention on well-being during the COVID-19 lockdown: past, present or future?

Amelia Dennis, Jane Ogden, Erica G. Hepper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Lockdown policies brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic pose a threat to well-being. This study examined the effectiveness of three positive psychology interventions, with different time-orientations, on well-being as well as predictors of well-being during lockdown. Participants (n= 261) completed measures of lockdown characteristics, attachment orientation, and emotion regulation, were then randomly allocated to one of four interventions; nostalgia (past), gratitude (present), best possible self (BPS; future) or control (recalling a TV show), and completed outcome measures of well-being and affect. Results showed that BPS resulted in higher positive affect and that both BPS and gratitude resulted in higher social connectedness than the nostalgia intervention. Further, greater well-being during lockdown was predicted by greater attachment security, greater emotion regulation, and more social interactions. In sum, focusing on the present or future during lockdown is more effective for well-being than focusing on the past, which alongside trait characteristics predict well-being under lockdown.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)419-429
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Positive Psychology
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • attachment
  • best possible self
  • COVID-19
  • emotion regulation
  • gratitude
  • nostalgia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the impact of a time orientation intervention on well-being during the COVID-19 lockdown: past, present or future?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this