Evaluating shear test methods for stabilised rammed earth

Jing Siong John Cheah, Pete Walker, Andrew Heath, Te Kipa Kepa Brian Morgan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)
98 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Rammed earth is an accessible, sustainable, and increasingly popular building material. Due to a lack of research, current design standards for rammed earth have taken a conservative stance on material attributes like shear strength. Evaluating the shear strength of rammed earth is particularly important in seismic areas due to the material's high mass, low ductility, and propensity to fail in shear. Shear test methods designed for other materials have typically been used in practice to determine the shear strength of rammed earth.
In this research the design shear strength guidance available in current earth building standards was compared with experimental shear strength results for stabilised rammed earth. The triaxial (geotechnical) and triplet (masonry) tests were used to evaluate specimens reinforced with natural fibres; Sisal and New Zealand flax. Both shear test methods showed that the shear strength capacity of cement stabilised rammed earth was greater than the current guidance provided in the earth building standards. Recommendations were made to use the triaxial test to evaluate the shear strength of stabilised rammed earth and to allow the use of a lower bound shear strength in design equal to 7% of the compressive strength.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)325-334
Number of pages10
JournalProceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers, Construction Materials
Volume165
Issue number6
Early online date2 Apr 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Shear strength
Earth (planet)
Flax
Compressive strength
Ductility
Cements

Keywords

  • Codes of practice & standards
  • structures & design
  • Buildings
  • Strength and testing of materials

Cite this

Evaluating shear test methods for stabilised rammed earth. / Cheah, Jing Siong John; Walker, Pete; Heath, Andrew; Morgan, Te Kipa Kepa Brian.

In: Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers, Construction Materials, Vol. 165, No. 6, 12.2012, p. 325-334.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fa680038b247426992b72b2d26e6b275,
title = "Evaluating shear test methods for stabilised rammed earth",
abstract = "Rammed earth is an accessible, sustainable, and increasingly popular building material. Due to a lack of research, current design standards for rammed earth have taken a conservative stance on material attributes like shear strength. Evaluating the shear strength of rammed earth is particularly important in seismic areas due to the material's high mass, low ductility, and propensity to fail in shear. Shear test methods designed for other materials have typically been used in practice to determine the shear strength of rammed earth. In this research the design shear strength guidance available in current earth building standards was compared with experimental shear strength results for stabilised rammed earth. The triaxial (geotechnical) and triplet (masonry) tests were used to evaluate specimens reinforced with natural fibres; Sisal and New Zealand flax. Both shear test methods showed that the shear strength capacity of cement stabilised rammed earth was greater than the current guidance provided in the earth building standards. Recommendations were made to use the triaxial test to evaluate the shear strength of stabilised rammed earth and to allow the use of a lower bound shear strength in design equal to 7{\%} of the compressive strength.",
keywords = "Codes of practice & standards, structures & design, Buildings, Strength and testing of materials",
author = "Cheah, {Jing Siong John} and Pete Walker and Andrew Heath and Morgan, {Te Kipa Kepa Brian}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1680/coma.10.00061",
language = "English",
volume = "165",
pages = "325--334",
journal = "Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Construction Materials",
issn = "1747-650X",
publisher = "Thomas Telford (ICE Publishing)",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating shear test methods for stabilised rammed earth

AU - Cheah, Jing Siong John

AU - Walker, Pete

AU - Heath, Andrew

AU - Morgan, Te Kipa Kepa Brian

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Rammed earth is an accessible, sustainable, and increasingly popular building material. Due to a lack of research, current design standards for rammed earth have taken a conservative stance on material attributes like shear strength. Evaluating the shear strength of rammed earth is particularly important in seismic areas due to the material's high mass, low ductility, and propensity to fail in shear. Shear test methods designed for other materials have typically been used in practice to determine the shear strength of rammed earth. In this research the design shear strength guidance available in current earth building standards was compared with experimental shear strength results for stabilised rammed earth. The triaxial (geotechnical) and triplet (masonry) tests were used to evaluate specimens reinforced with natural fibres; Sisal and New Zealand flax. Both shear test methods showed that the shear strength capacity of cement stabilised rammed earth was greater than the current guidance provided in the earth building standards. Recommendations were made to use the triaxial test to evaluate the shear strength of stabilised rammed earth and to allow the use of a lower bound shear strength in design equal to 7% of the compressive strength.

AB - Rammed earth is an accessible, sustainable, and increasingly popular building material. Due to a lack of research, current design standards for rammed earth have taken a conservative stance on material attributes like shear strength. Evaluating the shear strength of rammed earth is particularly important in seismic areas due to the material's high mass, low ductility, and propensity to fail in shear. Shear test methods designed for other materials have typically been used in practice to determine the shear strength of rammed earth. In this research the design shear strength guidance available in current earth building standards was compared with experimental shear strength results for stabilised rammed earth. The triaxial (geotechnical) and triplet (masonry) tests were used to evaluate specimens reinforced with natural fibres; Sisal and New Zealand flax. Both shear test methods showed that the shear strength capacity of cement stabilised rammed earth was greater than the current guidance provided in the earth building standards. Recommendations were made to use the triaxial test to evaluate the shear strength of stabilised rammed earth and to allow the use of a lower bound shear strength in design equal to 7% of the compressive strength.

KW - Codes of practice & standards

KW - structures & design

KW - Buildings

KW - Strength and testing of materials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871387528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/coma.10.00061

UR - http://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/content/serial/coma

U2 - 10.1680/coma.10.00061

DO - 10.1680/coma.10.00061

M3 - Article

VL - 165

SP - 325

EP - 334

JO - Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Construction Materials

JF - Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Construction Materials

SN - 1747-650X

IS - 6

ER -