Evaluating environmental impacts of bio-based insulation materials through scenario-based and dynamic life cycle assessment

Purpose: Bio-based insulation materials can have a significant impact in achieving net zero target in the construction sector. However, they face challenges due to lack of data on environmental performances and professional perception, hindering their proliferation. This study aims to combine scenario-based and dynamic analyses of environmental performances to provide comprehensive environmental information on bio-based thermal insulation materials. The goal is to empower professionals with robust information, facilitating informed decisions and promoting the selection of bio-based materials. Methods: Data on manufacturing, use, recyclability, and technical performance of eleven commercially available natural insulation materials were collected from the literature to create a Life Cycle Inventory (LCI). For each material, a scenario-based life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted by modelling variation in manufacturing, transportation, end-of-life and material properties, using the UK as the primary case study. Materials were compared to three non-bio-based insulation materials by ranking the thirteen environmental impact categories in EN 15804(2013) + A2(2019) to give an exhaustive overview of their potential benefits and burdens. Additionally, a dynamic LCIA was performed to implement in the analysis both short-and long-term emissions, exploring the impact of biogenic carbon. Results: The scenario analysis highlighted that recycled cotton and hemp fibre insulation have the lowest impact across all impact categories, attributed to their sustainable manufacturing processes and minimal impacts at the end-of-life stage. The dynamic LCIA demonstrated that recycled textile insulation has the lowest impact both in the short-term (prior to waste disposal) and the long-term (post-waste disposal), regardless of the chosen end-of-life scenario. Furthermore, it indicated that cotton and hemp fibre have a negligible impact on global temperature changes, achieving a net-zero effect in the short-term and close-to-zero impact in the long-term. Conclusion: The novelty of this paper lies in its comprehensive investigation of the environmental impacts of bio-based thermal insulation materials, employing multiple tools to enhance generalizability. These results will support decision-making by providing data ranges to help practitioners identify the most environmentally friendly insulation materials. Additionally, they offer insights into how similar products compare within that range, driving progress in the built environment towards net-zero emissions. Whilst the full dataset and evaluation methods are illustrated through a UK-based case study, this method can be adapted for specific scenarios and projects, due to the transparency of data and methods. This research significantly influences the built environment and promotes net-zero targets within the sector.