Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluating environmental and human health risks from phosphorus flame retardants in South West England using One Health water-based epidemiology

  • Centre of Excellence in Water-based Early Warning Systems for Health Protection
  • Wessex Water Services Ltd
  • Wessex Water Services Ltd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Phosphorus flames retardants (PFRs) are ubiquitous in everyday household items and buildings and as a result have been frequently detected in domestic wastewater as well as environmental matrices. A One Health water-based epidemiology framework was employed to screen for and retrospectively quantify 7 PFRs and 5 metabolites in the Avon catchment (5 cities and towns with varying population sizes and industrial contribution, representing >75% of the whole catchment population) to understand key contributors to environmental burden and evaluate potential risks to public and environmental health. Of these 12 analytes, 11 were detected at quantifiable levels in at least one wastewater sample. Influent daily loads and population normalised daily loads were used to identify any spatiotemporal trends. For all PFRs, daily loads increased with population equivalents suggesting that this was a major driver of PFR burden in domestic wastewater. Due to limited information on the human excretion of PFRs, daily intake was estimated based on three excretion scenarios. Estimated daily intakes of tri-n‑butyl phosphate (TnBP) were generally higher than their reference doses. While potential risk to public health could not be comprehensively assessed, it showed the potential for WBE to be utilised as part of an early warning framework. Average river daily loads suggested a steady increase of PFRs along the Avon River likely due to wastewater discharge. For some PFRs, average daily loads were greater upstream than downstream of wastewater discharge suggesting that other sources, (e.g., surface run-off) were contributing to their environmental presence. Environmental risk assessment was carried out using a risk quotient (RQ) method. RQ values found were high for triphenyl phosphate (TPhP) and moderate for tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (TBOEP) and TDCPP suggesting a potential risk to environmental health. This study showed the potential of using this framework, employing suspect screening and retrospective quantification, to holistically evaluate exposure within a catchment. It also highlighted, that different PFRs might constitute risks to humans and the environment, hence regulatory frameworks should consider One Health evaluation in decision making.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101437
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Hazardous Materials Advances
Volume23
Early online date28 Jul 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Aug 2026

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Funding

The support of Wessex Water Services Ltd, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P028403/1), and EPSRC Impact Acceleration Account (Project number: EP/R51164X/1, ENTRUST IAA) is greatly appreciated. The authors acknowledge the Material and Chemical Characterisation Facility (MC²) at the University of Bath (doi.org/ 10.15125/mx6j-3r54).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Environment
  • Phosphorus flame retardants
  • Public health
  • Risk assessment
  • Source apportionment
  • Wastewater surveillance
  • Wastewater-based epidemiology (wbe)
  • Water-based epidemiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating environmental and human health risks from phosphorus flame retardants in South West England using One Health water-based epidemiology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this