Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluating changes and predictors of intention to act on health in urban development: a single-arm pre-post mixed-methods study of the changing mindsets intervention

Sophie L. Turnbull, Martha Jordan, Rebecca J. Linnett, Krista Bondy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The built environment contributes to rising non-communicable diseases, including cancer, diabetes, respiratory illness, and poor mental health. These impacts disproportionately affect lower socio-economic groups, who experience greater exposure to harmful urban features. Evidence on these links alone has not led private-sector urban developers to prioritise health. The Changing Mindsets intervention was designed to increase intention to act on health and health inequalities among private-sector urban development professionals. This study assessed whether the intervention increased intention to act and identified predictors of change. Methods: We conducted a single-arm pre-post mixed-methods evaluation of the Changing Mindsets intervention delivered at six industry events in 2024, including four in-person and two online sessions. The intervention combined an industry-partner-led presentation, peer discussion, and a supporting website. Surveys were completed immediately before (T1), immediately after (T2), and three-months after the intervention (T3). Paired analyses assessed pre-post change in intention to act. Logistic regression examined predictors of improvement from T1 to T2. Seven participants completed follow-up interviews exploring changes in thinking and actions taken. Results: Of 156 attendees, 101 completed the T1 survey, 69 completed the T2 survey, and 22 completed the three-month follow-up. Immediately after the intervention, 19% of participants showed an increase in intention to act on health, while most showed no change. Paired analyses indicated a small increase in mean intention scores from T1 to T2, with limited evidence of a consistent group-level effect. Lower baseline intention and increased perceived psychological proximity to health issues were associated with improvement in intention to act. Mean intention scores remained elevated at three-months among respondents. Qualitative findings suggested that changes in thinking were linked to challenged assumptions about who can act on health. Reported actions most often involved initiating conversations and influencing others. Conclusions: The Changing Mindsets intervention was associated with increased intention to act on health among a subset of urban development professionals, particularly those with lower baseline intention and greater perceived proximity to health issues. Evidence for a strong average pre-post effect was limited. However, intention remained elevated at three-month follow-up among respondents, suggesting retention of motivation over time. Trial registration: ISRCTN12310546 registered on the 30th March 2021.

Original languageEnglish
Article number52
JournalArchives of Public Health
Volume84
Issue number1
Early online date6 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 Feb 2026

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the industry professionals in the land and development industries who were involved in the development of the intervention, who supported the implementation of the intervention and who attended the intervention sessions. In particular we would like to thank our industry partners Harry Knibb and Zoe Sharpe who were extensively involved in the development and delivery of the intervention. The intervention has been developed with considerable input from colleagues on the TRUUD team. This includes Neil Carhart and Pablo Newberry who collaborated on the development of the theoretical framework. For the development of the intervention Daniel Black provided expertise from his professional experience of working in the urban development system, Edward Kirton-Darling provided expertise on potential legal risks of not prioritising health, Eleanor Eaton and Alastair Hunt provided expertise on the HAUS model, and Jo White and Andy Gibson led on the development of the lived experience videos included in the intervention. Anna Le Gouais and Michael Chang also provided signposting to resources that could be included in the intervention website to support organisations to prioritise health in their work. The authors would like to thank Dr Martine Barons, Dr Rasseeda Virgo and Dr Linda Nichols of the University of Warwick Applied Statistics and Risk Unit for their work on the statistical analysis plan for this project.

Funding

This work was supported by the UK Prevention Research Partnership (award reference: MR/S037586/1), which is funded by the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, Natural Environment Research Council, Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), The Health Foundation and Wellcome.

FundersFunder number
Natural Environment Research Council
Economic and Social Research Council
Medical Research Council
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Wellcome
Public Health Agency
Cancer Research UK
British Heart Foundation
Northern Ireland
Health Foundation
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Health and Social Care Research and Development Division

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Chronic disease
  • Decision making
  • Health equity
  • Psycho-social intervention
  • Urban health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating changes and predictors of intention to act on health in urban development: a single-arm pre-post mixed-methods study of the changing mindsets intervention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this