European organizations and minority rights in Europe: on transforming the securitization dynamic

David J Galbreath, Joanne McEvoy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 11 Citations

Abstract

Minority rights conditionality has been seen by scholars as a key part of the EU enlargement process. While the focus on minority rights has largely been discussed in terms of democracy and even human rights, this article argues that conditionality was a result of the securitization of minorities rather than part of an agenda to protect or empower. In this article, we look at the methods of desecuritization as factors of ‘narratives, norms and nannies’. In response to Paul Roe’s conclusions about the impossibility of desecuritizing societal security, we examine whether the EU, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and the Council of Europe have the ability to change the societal dynamics among ethnic groups in such a way as to make the desecuritization of societal security more likely. Overall, we illustrate how a focus on ‘deconstructivist’ and ‘constructivist’ approaches to societal security has failed to make European organizations important transformative actors in interethnic relations.
LanguageEnglish
Pages267-284
Number of pages18
JournalSecurity Dialogue
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatusPublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

minority rights
EU
ethnic relations
Council of Europe
OSCE
ethnic group
human rights
minority
democracy
narrative
ability

Keywords

  • Conflict and security

Cite this

European organizations and minority rights in Europe: on transforming the securitization dynamic. / Galbreath, David J; McEvoy, Joanne.

In: Security Dialogue, Vol. 43, No. 3, 06.2012, p. 267-284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a06d4a54b0142449d1c5c5dfd899904,
title = "European organizations and minority rights in Europe: on transforming the securitization dynamic",
abstract = "Minority rights conditionality has been seen by scholars as a key part of the EU enlargement process. While the focus on minority rights has largely been discussed in terms of democracy and even human rights, this article argues that conditionality was a result of the securitization of minorities rather than part of an agenda to protect or empower. In this article, we look at the methods of desecuritization as factors of ‘narratives, norms and nannies’. In response to Paul Roe’s conclusions about the impossibility of desecuritizing societal security, we examine whether the EU, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and the Council of Europe have the ability to change the societal dynamics among ethnic groups in such a way as to make the desecuritization of societal security more likely. Overall, we illustrate how a focus on ‘deconstructivist’ and ‘constructivist’ approaches to societal security has failed to make European organizations important transformative actors in interethnic relations.",
keywords = "Conflict and security",
author = "Galbreath, {David J} and Joanne McEvoy",
note = "Please note: there are significant differences between the final published version and the authors' accepted version available to download above.",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/0967010612444149",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "267--284",
journal = "Security Dialogue",
issn = "0967-0106",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - European organizations and minority rights in Europe: on transforming the securitization dynamic

AU - Galbreath,David J

AU - McEvoy,Joanne

N1 - Please note: there are significant differences between the final published version and the authors' accepted version available to download above.

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Minority rights conditionality has been seen by scholars as a key part of the EU enlargement process. While the focus on minority rights has largely been discussed in terms of democracy and even human rights, this article argues that conditionality was a result of the securitization of minorities rather than part of an agenda to protect or empower. In this article, we look at the methods of desecuritization as factors of ‘narratives, norms and nannies’. In response to Paul Roe’s conclusions about the impossibility of desecuritizing societal security, we examine whether the EU, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and the Council of Europe have the ability to change the societal dynamics among ethnic groups in such a way as to make the desecuritization of societal security more likely. Overall, we illustrate how a focus on ‘deconstructivist’ and ‘constructivist’ approaches to societal security has failed to make European organizations important transformative actors in interethnic relations.

AB - Minority rights conditionality has been seen by scholars as a key part of the EU enlargement process. While the focus on minority rights has largely been discussed in terms of democracy and even human rights, this article argues that conditionality was a result of the securitization of minorities rather than part of an agenda to protect or empower. In this article, we look at the methods of desecuritization as factors of ‘narratives, norms and nannies’. In response to Paul Roe’s conclusions about the impossibility of desecuritizing societal security, we examine whether the EU, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and the Council of Europe have the ability to change the societal dynamics among ethnic groups in such a way as to make the desecuritization of societal security more likely. Overall, we illustrate how a focus on ‘deconstructivist’ and ‘constructivist’ approaches to societal security has failed to make European organizations important transformative actors in interethnic relations.

KW - Conflict and security

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862152158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0967010612444149

U2 - 10.1177/0967010612444149

DO - 10.1177/0967010612444149

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 267

EP - 284

JO - Security Dialogue

T2 - Security Dialogue

JF - Security Dialogue

SN - 0967-0106

IS - 3

ER -