EU–NATO cooperation: a case of institutional fatigue?

Simon Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although EU–NATO institutional relations have been evolving since the Saint-Malo Declaration in 1998, efficient and coherent cooperation is still lacking. This article goes beyond the narrative of blockage caused purely at the political level in order to illustrate both formal and informal EU–NATO cooperation at both the centre (Brussels) and on the ground (missions). This article addresses cooperation in terms of the actors involved at three different levels: state actors, international staff, and military personnel. Although, much has been done to advance cooperation between international staffers in Brussels and between those on the ground in common mission areas, the lack of a political agreement – one that moves beyond the limited scope of Berlin Plus – is causing severe fatigue, most notably at the level of international staff. Furthermore, the informal and ad hoc cooperation that has been the underlying facilitator of synergy between the two organisations could start to atrophy if a grand or intermediary bargain is not achieved in the near future
LanguageEnglish
Pages243-264
JournalEuropean Security
Volume20
Issue number2
Early online date15 Jul 2011
DOIs
StatusPublished - 15 Jul 2011

Fingerprint

NATO
fatigue
EU
staff
international cooperation
synergy
Berlin
personnel
Military
narrative
lack

Keywords

  • european union
  • NATO
  • institution

Cite this

EU–NATO cooperation : a case of institutional fatigue? / Smith, Simon.

In: European Security, Vol. 20, No. 2, 15.07.2011, p. 243-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Simon. / EU–NATO cooperation : a case of institutional fatigue?. In: European Security. 2011 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 243-264.
@article{7c7f29c49c56437591c886acf62b166b,
title = "EU–NATO cooperation: a case of institutional fatigue?",
abstract = "Although EU–NATO institutional relations have been evolving since the Saint-Malo Declaration in 1998, efficient and coherent cooperation is still lacking. This article goes beyond the narrative of blockage caused purely at the political level in order to illustrate both formal and informal EU–NATO cooperation at both the centre (Brussels) and on the ground (missions). This article addresses cooperation in terms of the actors involved at three different levels: state actors, international staff, and military personnel. Although, much has been done to advance cooperation between international staffers in Brussels and between those on the ground in common mission areas, the lack of a political agreement – one that moves beyond the limited scope of Berlin Plus – is causing severe fatigue, most notably at the level of international staff. Furthermore, the informal and ad hoc cooperation that has been the underlying facilitator of synergy between the two organisations could start to atrophy if a grand or intermediary bargain is not achieved in the near future",
keywords = "european union, NATO, institution",
author = "Simon Smith",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1080/09662839.2011.557771",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "243--264",
journal = "European Security",
issn = "0966-2839",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - EU–NATO cooperation

T2 - European Security

AU - Smith, Simon

PY - 2011/7/15

Y1 - 2011/7/15

N2 - Although EU–NATO institutional relations have been evolving since the Saint-Malo Declaration in 1998, efficient and coherent cooperation is still lacking. This article goes beyond the narrative of blockage caused purely at the political level in order to illustrate both formal and informal EU–NATO cooperation at both the centre (Brussels) and on the ground (missions). This article addresses cooperation in terms of the actors involved at three different levels: state actors, international staff, and military personnel. Although, much has been done to advance cooperation between international staffers in Brussels and between those on the ground in common mission areas, the lack of a political agreement – one that moves beyond the limited scope of Berlin Plus – is causing severe fatigue, most notably at the level of international staff. Furthermore, the informal and ad hoc cooperation that has been the underlying facilitator of synergy between the two organisations could start to atrophy if a grand or intermediary bargain is not achieved in the near future

AB - Although EU–NATO institutional relations have been evolving since the Saint-Malo Declaration in 1998, efficient and coherent cooperation is still lacking. This article goes beyond the narrative of blockage caused purely at the political level in order to illustrate both formal and informal EU–NATO cooperation at both the centre (Brussels) and on the ground (missions). This article addresses cooperation in terms of the actors involved at three different levels: state actors, international staff, and military personnel. Although, much has been done to advance cooperation between international staffers in Brussels and between those on the ground in common mission areas, the lack of a political agreement – one that moves beyond the limited scope of Berlin Plus – is causing severe fatigue, most notably at the level of international staff. Furthermore, the informal and ad hoc cooperation that has been the underlying facilitator of synergy between the two organisations could start to atrophy if a grand or intermediary bargain is not achieved in the near future

KW - european union

KW - NATO

KW - institution

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2011.557771

U2 - 10.1080/09662839.2011.557771

DO - 10.1080/09662839.2011.557771

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 243

EP - 264

JO - European Security

JF - European Security

SN - 0966-2839

IS - 2

ER -