Estimates of running ground reaction force parameters from motion analysis

Gaspare Pavei, Elena Seminati, Jorge Storniolo, Leonardo Peyré-Tartaruga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

We compared running mechanics parameters determined from ground reaction force (GRF) measurements with estimated forces obtained from double differentiation of kinematic (K) data from motion analysis in a broad spectrum of running speeds (1.94-5.56 m∙s-1). Data were collected through a force-instrumented treadmill and compared at different sampling frequencies (900 and 300 Hz for GRF, 300 and 100 Hz for K). Vertical force peak, shape, and impulse were similar between K methods and GRF. Contact time, flight time and vertical stiffness (kvert) obtained from K showed the same trend as GRF with differences <5%, whereas leg stiffness (kleg) was not correctly computed by kinematics. The results revealed that the main vertical GRF parameters can be computed by the double differentiation of the body centre of mass properly calculated by motion analysis. The present model provides an alternative accessible method for determining temporal and kinetic parameters of running without an instrumented treadmill.
LanguageEnglish
JournalJournal of Applied Biomechanics
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatusPublished - Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Biomechanical Phenomena
Mechanics
Leg

Cite this

Estimates of running ground reaction force parameters from motion analysis. / Pavei, Gaspare; Seminati, Elena; Storniolo, Jorge; Peyré-Tartaruga, Leonardo.

In: Journal of Applied Biomechanics, Vol. 33, No. 1, 02.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pavei, Gaspare ; Seminati, Elena ; Storniolo, Jorge ; Peyré-Tartaruga, Leonardo. / Estimates of running ground reaction force parameters from motion analysis. In: Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 2017 ; Vol. 33, No. 1.
@article{12ea72ee7e874acba4732ba589bd2856,
title = "Estimates of running ground reaction force parameters from motion analysis",
abstract = "We compared running mechanics parameters determined from ground reaction force (GRF) measurements with estimated forces obtained from double differentiation of kinematic (K) data from motion analysis in a broad spectrum of running speeds (1.94-5.56 m∙s-1). Data were collected through a force-instrumented treadmill and compared at different sampling frequencies (900 and 300 Hz for GRF, 300 and 100 Hz for K). Vertical force peak, shape, and impulse were similar between K methods and GRF. Contact time, flight time and vertical stiffness (kvert) obtained from K showed the same trend as GRF with differences <5{\%}, whereas leg stiffness (kleg) was not correctly computed by kinematics. The results revealed that the main vertical GRF parameters can be computed by the double differentiation of the body centre of mass properly calculated by motion analysis. The present model provides an alternative accessible method for determining temporal and kinetic parameters of running without an instrumented treadmill.",
author = "Gaspare Pavei and Elena Seminati and Jorge Storniolo and Leonardo Peyr{\'e}-Tartaruga",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1123/jab.2015-0329",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
journal = "Journal of Applied Biomechanics",
issn = "1065-8483",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimates of running ground reaction force parameters from motion analysis

AU - Pavei, Gaspare

AU - Seminati, Elena

AU - Storniolo, Jorge

AU - Peyré-Tartaruga, Leonardo

PY - 2017/2

Y1 - 2017/2

N2 - We compared running mechanics parameters determined from ground reaction force (GRF) measurements with estimated forces obtained from double differentiation of kinematic (K) data from motion analysis in a broad spectrum of running speeds (1.94-5.56 m∙s-1). Data were collected through a force-instrumented treadmill and compared at different sampling frequencies (900 and 300 Hz for GRF, 300 and 100 Hz for K). Vertical force peak, shape, and impulse were similar between K methods and GRF. Contact time, flight time and vertical stiffness (kvert) obtained from K showed the same trend as GRF with differences <5%, whereas leg stiffness (kleg) was not correctly computed by kinematics. The results revealed that the main vertical GRF parameters can be computed by the double differentiation of the body centre of mass properly calculated by motion analysis. The present model provides an alternative accessible method for determining temporal and kinetic parameters of running without an instrumented treadmill.

AB - We compared running mechanics parameters determined from ground reaction force (GRF) measurements with estimated forces obtained from double differentiation of kinematic (K) data from motion analysis in a broad spectrum of running speeds (1.94-5.56 m∙s-1). Data were collected through a force-instrumented treadmill and compared at different sampling frequencies (900 and 300 Hz for GRF, 300 and 100 Hz for K). Vertical force peak, shape, and impulse were similar between K methods and GRF. Contact time, flight time and vertical stiffness (kvert) obtained from K showed the same trend as GRF with differences <5%, whereas leg stiffness (kleg) was not correctly computed by kinematics. The results revealed that the main vertical GRF parameters can be computed by the double differentiation of the body centre of mass properly calculated by motion analysis. The present model provides an alternative accessible method for determining temporal and kinetic parameters of running without an instrumented treadmill.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jab.2015-0329

U2 - 10.1123/jab.2015-0329

DO - 10.1123/jab.2015-0329

M3 - Article

VL - 33

JO - Journal of Applied Biomechanics

T2 - Journal of Applied Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Applied Biomechanics

SN - 1065-8483

IS - 1

ER -