TY - JOUR
T1 - Errors in science
T2 - The role of reviewers
AU - Székely, T.
AU - Krüger, O.
AU - Krause, E.T.
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - Reviewers play a key role in science, although studies suggest the current peer-reviewing system has faults. We propose to introduce a quality control system to evaluate each journal's review process, and produce a Review Quality Index. We propose four schemes that have the potential to reduce errors in a key step in scientific decision making: the reviewing process.
AB - Reviewers play a key role in science, although studies suggest the current peer-reviewing system has faults. We propose to introduce a quality control system to evaluate each journal's review process, and produce a Review Quality Index. We propose four schemes that have the potential to reduce errors in a key step in scientific decision making: the reviewing process.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901182628&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.05.001
U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2014.05.001
DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2014.05.001
M3 - Article
SN - 0169-5347
VL - 29
SP - 371
EP - 373
JO - Trends in Ecology & Evolution
JF - Trends in Ecology & Evolution
IS - 7
ER -